Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 2008?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the thriving segment of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 stand out as top contenders, each bringing its unique flair and technological advancements. This comparison delves into the technical aspects and innovations that shape these two vehicles, aimed at helping buyers make informed decisions.
The Ford Puma measures 4186 mm in length and 1805 mm in width, offering a rugged yet stylish appearance typical of the Ford brand. With a height of 1550 mm, it provides ample headroom and a commanding driving position. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 is slightly longer at 4304 mm, with a width of 1770 mm and a height of 1523 mm. The Peugeot carries a more contemporary design language, with a sleek silhouette and intricate LED lighting.
The Puma offers a selection of engines, including petrol MHEV options producing between 125 to 168 HP, with associated torque figures ranging from 170 to 290 Nm. This power provides a 0-100 km/h acceleration time as quick as 7.4 seconds, alongside fuel consumption figures of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, depending on the variant chosen.
On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008's power range is slightly different, with petrol MHEV configurations achieving 136 HP and 206 Nm of torque. Its standout performance metric is a remarkably agile 0-100 km/h time of just 8.3 seconds with the strongest variant while maintaining an efficient consumption of around 5 L/100 km.
Both models demonstrate a commitment to electrification. The Ford Puma’s hybrid variant features a 43 kWh battery, enabling an electric range of up to 376 km. It logically combines the performance of a petrol engine with electric assistance, appealing to eco-conscious buyers.
Meanwhile, the Peugeot 2008 presents an even larger battery capacity ranging from 46 to 51 kWh, allowing it an electric range stretching up to 406 km. This edge reflects Peugeot’s innovative electric strategy, aiming to cater to the rising demand for greener mobility solutions.
Inside, the Ford Puma boasts a spacious cabin with a boot capacity of up to 523 L, making it practical for family needs. The infotainment system is embedded with Ford's latest SYNC technology, offering seamless smartphone integration and advanced vehicle features.
In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 excels in interior design, bringing a modern aesthetic with a 3D i-Cockpit layout. Although the trunk capacity of 434 L is slightly lesser than the Puma’s, the Peugeot prioritizes driver engagement with an intuitive touchscreen interface and a panoramic sunroof for enhanced ambiance.
In terms of safety, both vehicles are equipped with an array of features designed to ensure peace of mind on the road. Ford’s Co-Pilot360 includes advanced driver-assistance systems like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping aid, aiming to provide a more confident driving experience.
The Peugeot 2008, on the other hand, includes Safety Pack options that encompass features such as automatic emergency braking and a full suite of airbags, illustrating its dedication to occupant protection and collision avoidance.
Ultimately, choosing between the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 hinges on individual preference. The Puma offers a sportier performance and greater cargo space, while the 2008 impresses with its modern design and superior electric range. Buyers will find compelling options in either vehicle, backed by innovative technology and distinctive character that define the modern SUV experience.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot 2008 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 848 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 2008 uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is a bit more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.3 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 2008. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 12 km more than the Peugeot 2008.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers marginally more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers barely more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is marginally lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more boot space – 523 L compared to 434 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
The Ford Puma holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España