Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 2008 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 24500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 2008?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot 2008 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 309 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 2008 manages with 4.90 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 2008 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 406 km, about 30 km more than the Ford Puma.
2008
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slight edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Peugeot 2008 tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls slight stronger with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1263 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 434 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 2008 performs slightly better – up to 1467 L, which is about 184 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 2008
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Peugeot 2008
5 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot 2008
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
24500 - 40300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
406 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1263 - 1623 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4304 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1770 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1523 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1467 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.