Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Nissan Leaf comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 217 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Leaf?
Ford Puma vs Nissan Leaf: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Nissan Leaf costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,900 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is barely more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 13.7 kWh/100km for the Nissan Leaf. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Leaf offers markedly more range – reaching up to 624 km, about 207 km more than the Ford Puma.
Leaf
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Leaf offers visibly more power – delivering 217 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Leaf takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Leaf delivers somewhat more torque with 355 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,864 kg. The difference is around 548 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 437 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Nissan Leaf
The Nissan Leaf is a practical, easygoing electric hatch that turns daily commutes into a quiet, effortless affair while offering more cabin space than it lets on. It’s a sensible, wallet-friendly step into electrification for buyers who value comfort and simplicity over sporty drama, though those chasing long-distance thrills might look elsewhere.
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
30,800 - 41,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
436 - 624 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,864 - 1,956 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
437 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,810 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
441 - 444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
176 - 217 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
345 - 355 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.