Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Nissan Leaf - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 217 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 30800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Leaf?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Nissan Leaf costs 30800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6000 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Nissan Leaf with 16.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Nissan Leaf performs minimal better – achieving up to 385 km, about 9 km more than the Ford Puma.
Leaf
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Leaf has a noticeable edge – offering 217 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Leaf is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.90 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Leaf tops out at 157 km/h. The difference is around 53 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Leaf pulls to a small extent stronger with 340 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is distinct lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1580 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 394 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs evident better – up to 1283 L, which is about 493 L more than the Nissan Leaf.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slightly takes the win – 469 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Nissan Leaf
The Nissan Leaf is a practical, easygoing electric hatch that turns daily commutes into a quiet, effortless affair while offering more cabin space than it lets on. It’s a sensible, wallet-friendly step into electrification for buyers who value comfort and simplicity over sporty drama, though those chasing long-distance thrills might look elsewhere.
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
30800 - 37200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 385 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
39 - 59 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1580 - 1756 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 394 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4490 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1788 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1540 - 1545 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
790 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
384 - 415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 217 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.9 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
144 - 157 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
320 - 340 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2019
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.