VS

Ford Puma vs Nissan X-Trail comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan X-Trail?

Ford Puma vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • visibly lighter
details

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers visibly more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers significantly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 235 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 352 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries moderately more – 574 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
X-Trail - Dynamic High 22
X-Trail - Dynamic High 14
Nissan_Xtrail_High_043
Nissan_Xtrail_High_033

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
17 Feb 2026, 12:21:57

I drive an Outback every day; I had an X‑Trail as a courtesy car while mine was in for service. First impression after a few kilometres of driving — the suspension is a disaster. You get the feeling this car picks up every single imperfection in the tarmac. Also, at idle the engine causes noticeably more vibrations in the cabin than the Subaru. On the plus side, a more ergonomic gear lever and 360° cameras. But I wouldn’t swap...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
6 Feb 2026, 00:23:47

Beautiful, modern design, very good-quality materials, mega acceleration and power. Very modern, loaded with electronics. This is my second Nissan X‑Trail.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Shan Ak
24 Jan 2026, 14:20:58

I have 163 hp platinum premium pack . Car is going very smoothly and comfortable. Also powerful and useful details.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
The Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a dose of SUV styling. The Puma leans toward sporty handling, clever packaging and frugal petrol/mild-hybrid options, while the Avenger prioritises rugged looks and an …
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Hyundai Tucson
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Hyundai Tucson arrives with sharper styling, a high-tech cabin and punchy powertrain options — the gadget-forward, sporty choice for buyers who want flair and value. Nissan X‑Trail plays the practical card: roomier, more family-friendly and supremely comfortable on long runs, so pick the Tucson to …
Ford Puma
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.