Compare performance (168 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 3008?
In the competitive world of crossover SUVs, the Ford Puma and Peugeot 3008 stand out with their captivating design and modern innovations. They each bring unique elements to the table, catering to a broad spectrum of drivers. Let's delve into the finer details to see how these two SUVs compare on the road and in terms of technology.
The Ford Puma is crafted with a smaller, more compact design, sporting dimensions of up to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height of 1555 mm. It provides a practical yet sporty aesthetic ideal for city navigation and urban lifestyles. The Peugeot 3008, on the other hand, is more pronounced in its physical presence. Measuring 4542 mm long, 1895 mm wide, and 1641 mm high, it offers a more substantial and commanding stance, suitable for those who appreciate an authoritative road presence.
The Ford Puma is versatile, available in both petrol MHEV and electric options. It offers horsepower ranges from 125 HP to 168 HP, with top speeds reaching up to 210 km/h. The Ford Puma acceleration ranges from 9.8 seconds to an impressive 7.4 seconds for 0-100 km/h, catering to both efficiency and thrill-seekers.
Peugeot 3008 steps in with petrol MHEV, plugin hybrid, and fully electric powertrains. It offers a broader power range of 136 HP to 231 HP, and top speeds that reach 220 km/h. The model's diverse powertrain options provide flexibility for both urban and long-distance travel, with its plugin hybrid version notably offering as low as 0.9 L/100 km fuel consumption.
The Puma introduces modern touches such as a Dual-Clutch Automatic and Reduction Gearbox in its electric models, providing smooth transitions and an engaging driving experience. Ford's innovation in hybrid technology is apparent with its variable CO2 efficiency classes, including an all-electric option boasting zero emissions.
Peugeot 3008 excels with its hybrid technology and reduction gearbox in electric versions, emphasizing eco-friendliness with electric ranges up to 698 km. It offers a sophisticated driving experience with its various hybrid engines, reaching an impressive 524 km electric range in some configurations, making it a leader in its class for sustainability and long-distance capability.
Both models accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Ford Puma offers a trunk capacity of up to 523 liters, making it a practical choice for daily commuting with ample storage space. Peugeot’s larger dimensions allow for a trunk capacity of 520 liters, which pairs well with its overall spaciousness, providing a luxurious travel experience.
When comparing the Ford Puma and Peugeot 3008, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The Puma caters to those looking for a nimble, city-friendly SUV with a nod to sporty driving dynamics. The 3008, with its extensive range in powertrains and luxurious space, suits those leaning toward comfort and innovation for longer journeys.
Both vehicles exhibit remarkable advancements in the hybrid and electric vehicle sectors. They stand as exemplars of modern SUV design by combining efficiency, technology, and style in distinct packages tailored for today’s driver.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot 3008 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,228 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 3008 uses 2.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 3008. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 3008 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 698 km, about 281 km more than the Ford Puma.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 offers clearly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 3008 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 3008 delivers substantially more torque with 511 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,648 kg. The difference is around 332 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 467 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.
The Peugeot 3008 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Peugeot 3008 blends bold French styling with a surprisingly grown-up interior that makes even dull commutes feel a little bit special. Practical enough for family life yet lively to drive, it’s a clever all‑rounder that stands out from the crossover crowd without shouting for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,648 - 2,266 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,542 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,641 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,430 - 1,480 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
170 - 201 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España