Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 308 SW comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 195 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 308 SW?
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 308 SW: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot 308 SW costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,206 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 308 SW uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.7 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 308 SW. That’s a difference of about 2.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 308 SW offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 444 km, about 27 km more than the Ford Puma.
308 SW
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 308 SW offers moderately more power – delivering 195 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Peugeot 308 SW takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 308 SW delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,484 kg. The difference is around 168 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 308 SW offers only slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 308 SW carries barely more – 508 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 308 SW is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,100
Peugeot 308 SW
Ford Puma
Peugeot 308 SW
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Peugeot 308 SW
The Peugeot 308 SW blends French flair with estate practicality, dressing up daily chores in a surprisingly handsome package. Inside it's cleverly laid out and comfortable, and the composed, entertaining drive makes family duty feel a little less like a chore.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot 308 SW
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
30,100 - 43,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
81 - 444 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,484 - 1,783 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
467 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
417 - 508 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.