Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 5008 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 39,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 5008?
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 5008: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot 5008 costs 39,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,394 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 5008 uses 2.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 5008. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 5008 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 669 km, about 252 km more than the Ford Puma.
5008
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 5008 offers considerably more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 5008 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 5008 delivers considerably more torque with 511 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Peugeot 5008 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 348 L. That’s a difference of about 175 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 5008 carries clearly more – 640 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 171 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 5008 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,300
Peugeot 5008
Ford Puma
Peugeot 5008
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Peugeot 5008
The Peugeot 5008 blends Peugeot's sharp design with the space and versatility families actually need, wrapping clever packaging and a premium-feeling cabin in a crisp, SUV-like silhouette. It drives with more poise than you'd expect from a people carrier, serves up practical touches and flexible seating for everyday chaos, and still looks good when parked outside the school gates.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot 5008
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
39,300 - 54,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
78 - 669 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,700 - 2,344 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
294 - 348 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
596 - 640 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.