VS

Ford Puma vs Polestar 3 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 67,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Polestar 3?

Ford Puma vs Polestar 3: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Polestar 3

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 43,714 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Polestar 3. That’s a difference of about 4.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Polestar 3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 647 km, about 230 km more than the Ford Puma.

3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 512 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 3 delivers substantially more torque with 870 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 580 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,315 kg. The difference is around 999 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.

When it comes to payload, the Polestar 3 carries clearly more – 645 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £67,600
3

Polestar 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 601 - 647 km
Ford Puma
Polestar 3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Polestar 3

Polestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.

details
Ford Puma
Polestar 3

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
67,600 - 91,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
601 - 647 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,315 - 2,525 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
605 - 645 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Polestar
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.