@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Hyundai Motor Company
VS

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Inster – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai Inster?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Showdown in the Urban Arena: Ford Puma vs. Hyundai Inster

The compact SUV segment continues to be a battleground for innovation and performance. As automakers push boundaries, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Inster stand out as notable contenders. Both vehicles offer striking technological advancements and eco-friendly options, yet cater to different niches within the modern urban lifestyle. Let's dive into a comparative analysis of these two models.

Inster @ Hyundai Motor Company

The Heart of the Matter: Power and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a versatile powertrain lineup, featuring both Petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and fully electric options. Available with powers ranging from 125 HP to 168 HP, it presents a broad spectrum of driving dynamics. The electronic options boast a robust 160 HP with acceleration from 0-100 km/h as swift as 7.4 seconds, showcasing its prowess in the city and beyond. The Puma's top speed can reach 210 km/h, making it an exciting choice for drivers seeking spirited performance.

Hyundai's Inster, on the other hand, is solely electric, focusing on efficiency with 97 HP and 115 HP configurations. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h, accomplished in as quickly as 10.6 seconds, is respectable for its class, offering a smooth and quiet urban driving experience. While its maximum speed caps at 150 km/h, its strength lies in sustainable driving and urban usability.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Efficiency and Range

When it comes to efficiency, the Ford Puma strikes a balance with both petrol and electric options showing impressive consumption figures. The MHEV variants register between 5.4 and 6 L/100km, while the electric versions consume 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The electric Puma model provides an impressive range of up to 376 km, ideal for reducing range anxiety on longer drives.

The Hyundai Inster, committed to electric performance, offers an electric range between 327 km and 370 km depending on the battery capacity chosen, which ranges from 42 kWh to 49 kWh. With consumption rates between 14.3 and 15.1 kWh/100km, it positions itself strongly within the efficiency spectrum, making it a reliable choice for the environmentally conscious urban commuter.

Inster @ Hyundai Motor Company

Room to Move: Interior and Cargo Space

Inside the Ford Puma, space and flexibility are apparent. It accommodates five passengers comfortably, and an impressive trunk capacity that ranges from 456 to 523 liters, depending on model configuration, emphasizes its practicality for everyday needs.

On the contrary, the Hyundai Inster is tailored for compact efficiency, seating four occupants with a trunk capacity ranging from 238 to 280 liters. It may cater more to those who prioritize compact design and ease of navigation in urban settings rather than expansive cargo and passenger volume.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion: Which SUV Fits Your Lifestyle?

The Ford Puma and Hyundai Inster represent a cross-section of modern automotive desires, from performance versatility to eco-conscious efficiency. The Puma appeals to those seeking versatility in power options and greater cargo space, while the Inster balances efficiency and a pure electric drive ideal for urban environments.

In sum, your decision may ultimately rest on your lifestyle. Do you lean towards the performance dynamism of hybrid powertrains and spacious utility as offered by the Ford Puma? Or is the sustainable, streamlined efficiency and electric innovation of the Hyundai Inster more aligned with your vision of urban navigating? The choice is yours to make as these contenders lead the way in redefining the urban SUV experience.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Inster @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Hyundai Inster has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20500 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4286 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Hyundai Inster with 14.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.20 kWh.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 376 km, about 6 km more than the Hyundai Inster.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Hyundai Inster takes 10.60 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Hyundai Inster tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls decisively stronger with 290 Nm compared to 147 Nm. That’s about 143 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Puma offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers decisively more room – 523 L compared to 280 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 224 L more than the Hyundai Inster.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 357 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Hyundai Inster

The Inster has quickly captured the attention of automotive enthusiasts with its striking design and dynamic performance. This model seamlessly blends advanced technology with comfort, making it an ideal choice for both daily commutes and adventurous road trips. With its spacious interior and innovative features, the Inster promises an exhilarating driving experience that doesn’t compromise on practicality.

details
hyundai-inster-premiere-exterior-04-1 @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-inster-premiere-exterior-01 @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-inster-premiere-interior-kv @ Hyundai Motor Company

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Inster
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Inster @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
20500 - 25800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.1 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
327 - 370 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
42 - 49 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1433 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
238 - 280 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
3825 - 3845 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1610 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1575 - 1610 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1059 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
317 - 357 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
97 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 11.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
140 - 150 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
147 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
71 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Inster
Renault R4
VS
In the bustling world of compact vehicles, the Hyundai Elantra and the Renault 4 present intriguing options for discerning drivers. The Hyundai Elantra stands out with its modern design, advanced safety features, and efficient fuel economy, making it a solid choice for city commuters. Meanwhile, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.