VS

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Inster comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 20,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai Inster?

Ford Puma vs Hyundai Inster: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Hyundai Inster

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Showdown in the Urban Arena: Ford Puma vs. Hyundai Inster

The compact SUV segment continues to be a battleground for innovation and performance. As automakers push boundaries, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Inster stand out as notable contenders. Both vehicles offer striking technological advancements and eco-friendly options, yet cater to different niches within the modern urban lifestyle. Let's dive into a comparative analysis of these two models.

Inster

The Heart of the Matter: Power and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a versatile powertrain lineup, featuring both Petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and fully electric options. Available with powers ranging from 125 HP to 168 HP, it presents a broad spectrum of driving dynamics. The electronic options boast a robust 160 HP with acceleration from 0-100 km/h as swift as 7.4 seconds, showcasing its prowess in the city and beyond. The Puma's top speed can reach 210 km/h, making it an exciting choice for drivers seeking spirited performance.

Hyundai's Inster, on the other hand, is solely electric, focusing on efficiency with 97 HP and 115 HP configurations. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h, accomplished in as quickly as 10.6 seconds, is respectable for its class, offering a smooth and quiet urban driving experience. While its maximum speed caps at 150 km/h, its strength lies in sustainable driving and urban usability.

Puma

Efficiency and Range

When it comes to efficiency, the Ford Puma strikes a balance with both petrol and electric options showing impressive consumption figures. The MHEV variants register between 5.4 and 6 L/100km, while the electric versions consume 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The electric Puma model provides an impressive range of up to 376 km, ideal for reducing range anxiety on longer drives.

The Hyundai Inster, committed to electric performance, offers an electric range between 327 km and 370 km depending on the battery capacity chosen, which ranges from 42 kWh to 49 kWh. With consumption rates between 14.3 and 15.1 kWh/100km, it positions itself strongly within the efficiency spectrum, making it a reliable choice for the environmentally conscious urban commuter.

Inster

Room to Move: Interior and Cargo Space

Inside the Ford Puma, space and flexibility are apparent. It accommodates five passengers comfortably, and an impressive trunk capacity that ranges from 456 to 523 liters, depending on model configuration, emphasizes its practicality for everyday needs.

On the contrary, the Hyundai Inster is tailored for compact efficiency, seating four occupants with a trunk capacity ranging from 238 to 280 liters. It may cater more to those who prioritize compact design and ease of navigation in urban settings rather than expansive cargo and passenger volume.

Puma

Conclusion: Which SUV Fits Your Lifestyle?

The Ford Puma and Hyundai Inster represent a cross-section of modern automotive desires, from performance versatility to eco-conscious efficiency. The Puma appeals to those seeking versatility in power options and greater cargo space, while the Inster balances efficiency and a pure electric drive ideal for urban environments.

In sum, your decision may ultimately rest on your lifestyle. Do you lean towards the performance dynamism of hybrid powertrains and spacious utility as offered by the Ford Puma? Or is the sustainable, streamlined efficiency and electric innovation of the Hyundai Inster more aligned with your vision of urban navigating? The choice is yours to make as these contenders lead the way in redefining the urban SUV experience.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Inster
Kia EV2
VS
This side-by-side look at the Hyundai Inster and the Kia EV2 will help you decide which electric compact best suits your driving habits and budget. I’ll compare range, performance, interior comfort, charging practicality and ownership costs so you can pick the model that matches your priorities.
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Hyundai Inster is a bit cheaper – starting at 20,900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is a bit more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.3 kWh/100km for the Hyundai Inster. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers a bit more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 47 km more than the Hyundai Inster.

Inster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Inster takes 10.6 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers substantially more torque with 290 Nm compared to 147 Nm. That’s about 143 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers substantially more boot space – 523 L compared to 280 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 357 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Hyundai Inster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Hyundai Inster

The Inster has quickly captured the attention of automotive enthusiasts with its striking design and dynamic performance. This model seamlessly blends advanced technology with comfort, making it an ideal choice for both daily commutes and adventurous road trips. With its spacious interior and innovative features, the Inster promises an exhilarating driving experience that doesn’t compromise on practicality.

details
hyundai-inster-premiere-exterior-04-1
hyundai-inster-premiere-exterior-01
hyundai-inster-premiere-interior-kv

Reviews Hyundai Inster

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
HL
12 Jun 2026, 07:14:37

Practical car with a fresh look and plenty of choices when it comes to equipment. For us it came down to a Ford and a Hyundai. In my experience the Ford Puma e felt a bit bumpier and the Inster is calmer, partly thanks to the long wheelbase. That the Ford doesn’t have a heat pump is a miss. The Inster’s coffee-break alert gets on your nerves almost immediately and apparently can’t be switched off. Hyundai blames EU rules, but there must be a solution? This misses the mark!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Hyundai Inster
Renault Twingo
VS
City-car showdown: the Hyundai Inster goes head-to-head with the Renault Twingo in a battle of practicality, personality and pocket-friendly running costs. We test them in real-world city conditions — parking, commute, cabin comfort and ownership — so you can pick the best small car for urban life.
Hyundai Inster
Nissan Micra
VS
The Hyundai Inster hustles through town with roomy practicality and wallet-friendly running costs, while the Nissan Micra scores points for sharper handling, cheeky styling and a more engaging turbo feel. For no-nonsense commuting pick the Inster; if you crave personality and a bit of fun behind …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Hyundai Inster
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Hyundai Inster and the BYD Dolphin Surf are two fresh contenders in the compact car segment, each taking a different approach to styling, technology and everyday practicality. This comparison will highlight the key differences in comfort, efficiency, driving feel and value so you can pick the …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the MG ZS comes down to whether you prioritise driving dynamics and refinement or space and value. The Puma is a compact, agile crossover with sharper handling, a more upmarket cabin and peppy engines, while the MG ZS trades sportiness for generous interior space, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Inster

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
20,900 - 26,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
327 - 370 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,433 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
238 - 280 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,610 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
317 - 357 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
97 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 11.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
147 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
71 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.