@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Fabia – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Skoda Fabia?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Introduction: The Battle of Two Compact Giants

In today’s automotive landscape, consumers take center stage, looking for cars that can deliver practicality, performance, and innovation. Among the contenders in this highly competitive segment, the Ford Puma and the Skoda Fabia stand out. Each car brings its unique character and set of technologies to the table, targeting different tastes and preferences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical aspects, design features, and innovations of both models.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Overview: Body Type and Interior Space

The Ford Puma is an SUV that offers additional ground clearance and a commanding view of the road, appealing to those who enjoy a sportier stance. With a length of up to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, it provides significant practicality without sacrificing style.

On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia is a compact hatchback, measuring 4108 mm in length. It boasts a trunk space of 380 liters, making it a reliable choice for urban drivers who require efficiency and versatility in a smaller package. Both models can comfortably seat five passengers, catering to family and individual needs alike.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine Options and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a range of powertrains, including petrol MHEV and fully electric options. The petrol engines range from 125 to a potent 168 HP, with acceleration times from 9.8 seconds up to an impressive 7.4 seconds for the most powerful variant. Fuel consumption averages between 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, showcasing its efficiency for a vehicle of its category.

In comparison, the Skoda Fabia, while limited to petrol engines only, delivers power levels from 80 to 150 HP, with the top-performing variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is slightly more efficient, averaging from 5 to 5.5 L/100 km. The Fabia's torque figures peak at 250 Nm, providing adequate performance for daily driving.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Transmission and Driving Experience

Both vehicles offer a choice of manuals and automatic transmissions, including dual-clutch systems. The Ford Puma features a dual-clutch automatic as well as a manual gearbox, ensuring smooth shifting and responsive handling. With a front-wheel-drive setup, it provides a confident driving experience across varying terrains.

Similarly, the Skoda Fabia's manual and dual-clutch options ensure drivers can tailor their driving experience. It also adopts a front-wheel-drive format, emphasizing nimbleness and agility in city environments. With a maximum speed of up to 225 km/h, the Fabia shows strong performance capabilities for a compact hatchback.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Innovative Features and Technology

The Ford Puma takes pride in its advanced technology with features such as Ford’s Co-Pilot360 driver assistance suite, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance. Furthermore, with hybrid and electric variants, it exemplifies the brand's commitment to sustainability and modern environmental standards.

In contrast, the Skoda Fabia embraces connectivity and efficiency with its SmartLink technology, integrating seamlessly with smartphones via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety technologies such as front assist and lane assist further enhance the driving experience, ensuring peace of mind with every journey.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion: Which One Will You Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The Puma shines as a sporty SUV focusing on performance and advanced technology, while the Fabia offers a compact solution ideal for urban settings, excelling in efficiency and innovation. Both vehicles provide exceptional value and capabilities within their respective segments, making them worthy contenders in today’s automotive market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Fabia has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7894 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 177 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs slight better – reaching 228 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is to a small extent lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 173 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 93 L more than the Skoda Fabia.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Fabia shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £16,900
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Skoda Fabia
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
16900 - 30500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1143 - 1278 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4108 - 4137 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1458 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.