In the competitive subcompact market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, making it a fun choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, offering excellent value for families and budget-conscious buyers alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on whether you prioritize performance or functionality in your daily commute.
In today’s automotive landscape, consumers take center stage, looking for cars that can deliver practicality, performance, and innovation. Among the contenders in this highly competitive segment, the Ford Puma and the Skoda Fabia stand out. Each car brings its unique character and set of technologies to the table, targeting different tastes and preferences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical aspects, design features, and innovations of both models.
The Ford Puma is an SUV that offers additional ground clearance and a commanding view of the road, appealing to those who enjoy a sportier stance. With a length of up to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, it provides significant practicality without sacrificing style.
On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia is a compact hatchback, measuring 4108 mm in length. It boasts a trunk space of 380 liters, making it a reliable choice for urban drivers who require efficiency and versatility in a smaller package. Both models can comfortably seat five passengers, catering to family and individual needs alike.
The Ford Puma offers a range of powertrains, including petrol MHEV and fully electric options. The petrol engines range from 125 to a potent 168 HP, with acceleration times from 9.8 seconds up to an impressive 7.4 seconds for the most powerful variant. Fuel consumption averages between 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, showcasing its efficiency for a vehicle of its category.
In comparison, the Skoda Fabia, while limited to petrol engines only, delivers power levels from 80 to 150 HP, with the top-performing variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is slightly more efficient, averaging from 5 to 5.5 L/100 km. The Fabia's torque figures peak at 250 Nm, providing adequate performance for daily driving.
Both vehicles offer a choice of manuals and automatic transmissions, including dual-clutch systems. The Ford Puma features a dual-clutch automatic as well as a manual gearbox, ensuring smooth shifting and responsive handling. With a front-wheel-drive setup, it provides a confident driving experience across varying terrains.
Similarly, the Skoda Fabia's manual and dual-clutch options ensure drivers can tailor their driving experience. It also adopts a front-wheel-drive format, emphasizing nimbleness and agility in city environments. With a maximum speed of up to 225 km/h, the Fabia shows strong performance capabilities for a compact hatchback.
The Ford Puma takes pride in its advanced technology with features such as Ford’s Co-Pilot360 driver assistance suite, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance. Furthermore, with hybrid and electric variants, it exemplifies the brand's commitment to sustainability and modern environmental standards.
In contrast, the Skoda Fabia embraces connectivity and efficiency with its SmartLink technology, integrating seamlessly with smartphones via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety technologies such as front assist and lane assist further enhance the driving experience, ensuring peace of mind with every journey.
Ultimately, the choice between the Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The Puma shines as a sporty SUV focusing on performance and advanced technology, while the Fabia offers a compact solution ideal for urban settings, excelling in efficiency and innovation. Both vehicles provide exceptional value and capabilities within their respective segments, making them worthy contenders in today’s automotive market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 16600 - 25600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
112 - 124
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1116 - 1310
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
380
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
4108
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1780
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1459 - 1479
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
360 - 457
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
80 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 15.7
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 225
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
93 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
59 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
175 - 225
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.