Ford Puma vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Puma?

Up to 168 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Puma according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Ford Puma consumes 5.40 L.

Q: How much electricity does the Ford Puma use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Ford Puma requires 13 kWh.

Q: What is the Ford Puma’s maximum WLTP range?

The WLTP range is up to 417 km.

Q: What is the top speed of the Ford Puma?

The Ford Puma reaches up to 210 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Puma’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Ford Puma is 4186 mm long, 1805 mm wide and 1550 mm high.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Skoda Fabia deliver on the road?

The Skoda Fabia reaches a peak output of 177 HP, depending on the model.

Q: How much fuel does the Skoda Fabia use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.90 L.

Compare performance (168 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 16900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Fabia?

scroll down

Puma

Introduction: The Battle of Two Compact Giants

In today’s automotive landscape, consumers take center stage, looking for cars that can deliver practicality, performance, and innovation. Among the contenders in this highly competitive segment, the Ford Puma and the Skoda Fabia stand out. Each car brings its unique character and set of technologies to the table, targeting different tastes and preferences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical aspects, design features, and innovations of both models.

Fabia

Overview: Body Type and Interior Space

The Ford Puma is an SUV that offers additional ground clearance and a commanding view of the road, appealing to those who enjoy a sportier stance. With a length of up to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, it provides significant practicality without sacrificing style.

On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia is a compact hatchback, measuring 4108 mm in length. It boasts a trunk space of 380 liters, making it a reliable choice for urban drivers who require efficiency and versatility in a smaller package. Both models can comfortably seat five passengers, catering to family and individual needs alike.

Puma

Engine Options and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a range of powertrains, including petrol MHEV and fully electric options. The petrol engines range from 125 to a potent 168 HP, with acceleration times from 9.8 seconds up to an impressive 7.4 seconds for the most powerful variant. Fuel consumption averages between 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, showcasing its efficiency for a vehicle of its category.

In comparison, the Skoda Fabia, while limited to petrol engines only, delivers power levels from 80 to 150 HP, with the top-performing variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is slightly more efficient, averaging from 5 to 5.5 L/100 km. The Fabia's torque figures peak at 250 Nm, providing adequate performance for daily driving.

scroll down

Fabia

Transmission and Driving Experience

Both vehicles offer a choice of manuals and automatic transmissions, including dual-clutch systems. The Ford Puma features a dual-clutch automatic as well as a manual gearbox, ensuring smooth shifting and responsive handling. With a front-wheel-drive setup, it provides a confident driving experience across varying terrains.

Similarly, the Skoda Fabia's manual and dual-clutch options ensure drivers can tailor their driving experience. It also adopts a front-wheel-drive format, emphasizing nimbleness and agility in city environments. With a maximum speed of up to 225 km/h, the Fabia shows strong performance capabilities for a compact hatchback.

Puma

Innovative Features and Technology

The Ford Puma takes pride in its advanced technology with features such as Ford’s Co-Pilot360 driver assistance suite, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance. Furthermore, with hybrid and electric variants, it exemplifies the brand's commitment to sustainability and modern environmental standards.

In contrast, the Skoda Fabia embraces connectivity and efficiency with its SmartLink technology, integrating seamlessly with smartphones via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety technologies such as front assist and lane assist further enhance the driving experience, ensuring peace of mind with every journey.

Fabia

Conclusion: Which One Will You Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Ford Puma and Skoda Fabia boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The Puma shines as a sporty SUV focusing on performance and advanced technology, while the Fabia offers a compact solution ideal for urban settings, excelling in efficiency and innovation. Both vehicles provide exceptional value and capabilities within their respective segments, making them worthy contenders in today’s automotive market.

Ford Puma vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

a bit more trunk space

Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)

convincingly cheaper
hardly perceptible more power
a bit more efficient
to a small extent lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Fabia has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7894 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 177 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs slight better – reaching 228 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is to a small extent lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 173 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more room – 456 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1216 L, which is about 26 L more than the Skoda Fabia.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia

Skoda Kamiq

If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …

Skoda Fabia

Skoda Scala

Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

Ford Puma

Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Fuel tank capacity

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £16,900

Skoda Fabia

Price : 16900 - 30500 £
Body Type : Hatchback
Engine Type : Petrol
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.4 - 15.7 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 175 - 228 km/h
Torque : 93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3 - 4
Doors : 5
Model : Fabia
Modell : Fabia 1.0 MPI, Fabia 1.0 TSI, Fabia 1.5 TSI
CO2 Efficiency Class : D, C
Trim Level : Essence, Selection, Monte Carlo, Selection DSG, Monte Carlo DSG, Balance, Balance DSG, "130" DSG
Power kW : 59 - 130 kW
co2 : 112 - 126 g/km
Engine capacity : 999 - 1498 cm3
Curb weight : 1143 - 1278 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 40 L
Trunk capacity : 380 L
Length : 4108 - 4137 mm
Width : 1780 mm
Height : 1458 - 1461 mm
Brand : Skoda
Max trunk capacity : 1190 L
Payload : 402 - 437 kg

details

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details

Reviews Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)

Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Ford Puma

Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price 24800 - 36300 £	Price 16900 - 30500 £
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.7 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 404 - 417 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 135 g/km	co2 112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1316 - 1563 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1278 kg
Trunk capacity 456 L	Trunk capacity 380 L
Length 4186 - 4226 mm	Length 4108 - 4137 mm
Width 1805 mm	Width 1780 mm
Height 1550 mm	Height 1458 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity 1216 L	Max trunk capacity 1190 L
Payload 367 - 469 kg	Payload 402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP	Power HP 80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed 190 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 175 - 228 km/h
Torque 170 - 290 Nm	Torque 93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 92 - 124 kW	Power kW 59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity 999 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3