VS

Ford Puma vs Mercedes GLA comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 421 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 38,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes GLA?

Ford Puma vs Mercedes GLA: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat lighter
details

Mercedes GLA

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

The automotive market offers an array of choices for SUV enthusiasts, with options ranging from budget-friendly to luxury. In this article, we delve deep into two popular contenders—the Ford Puma and the Mercedes GLA. Both models offer unique features and innovations that cater to different lifestyles and preferences. Let’s explore how they stack up against each other in terms of technical specifications, design, driving experience, and innovations.

GLA

Dimensions and Design

The Ford Puma, with a length of 4186 mm to 4226 mm and a height of 1550 mm to 1555 mm, presents a compact yet functional design that's perfect for urban driving while still being practical for family use, with a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters.

In stark contrast, the Mercedes GLA is slightly larger, measuring between 4412 mm and 4443 mm in length and 1590 mm to 1616 mm in height, boasting a trunk capacity of 385 to 435 liters. The GLA’s refined and elegant look showcases Mercedes-Benz's iconic design language, appealing to those who desire luxury in their vehicles.

Puma

Engine Options and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a selection of powertrains, including petrol MHEV options ranging from 125 HP to an impressive 168 HP, with a manual gearbox and dual-clutch automatic transmission options. The Puma also showcases remarkable efficiency, achieving fuel consumption as low as 5.4 L/100 km and an impressive electric range of 376 km from its 43 kWh battery.

On the other hand, the Mercedes GLA comes equipped with a more extensive range of engine choices, ranging up to 421 HP in performance models. With diesel, petrol, and hybrid variants, the GLA demonstrates flexibility for various driving tastes. Its efficient lineup also delivers competitive fuel economy, with some models going as low as 5.4 L/100 km. The GLA's acceleration options are equally impressive, with top models achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.3 seconds.

GLA

Driving Experience and Handling

When driving the Puma, you can expect a user-friendly experience thanks to its front-wheel-drive configuration, with nimble handling that’s ideal for both city streets and country lanes. With a torque of up to 290 Nm, it provides sufficient oomph for daily commutes and weekend adventures alike.

The GLA, with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, offers a more dynamic driving experience. The enhanced torque output, reaching up to 500 Nm in high-performance variants, ensures that it can handle various driving conditions effortlessly. Furthermore, its adaptive driving modes allow for customizable performance suited to the driver’s needs.

Puma

Interior Features and Technology

Inside the Ford Puma, you will find a spacious and well-designed cabin, equipped with modern technology that includes a user-friendly infotainment system, compatibility with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and Ford's latest safety technologies. Its focus on practicality makes it an excellent choice for families or those needing extra storage space.

The GLA elevates luxury with a high-tech interior that features dual digital displays for the instrument cluster and infotainment system. The MBUX infotainment system provides a seamless interface for navigation, music, and climate control, offering an engaging driving experience. Advanced safety features and a premium audio system further enhance comfort and enjoyment.

GLA

Efficiency and Emissions

Both vehicles strive for efficiency, but with different emphases. The Ford Puma prides itself on environmental efficiency, achieving CO2 emissions as low as 121 g/km while maintaining competitive consumption figures. Its hybrid variants further bolster its green credentials.

The GLA, while still delivering efficient options, has a broader range of emissions depending on the engine chosen, with some models reaching CO2 emissions as high as 216 g/km. However, the inclusion of hybrid engines showcases Mercedes-Benz’s commitment to sustainability.

Puma

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Mercedes GLA ultimately comes down to your individual needs and preferences. The Ford Puma is an excellent option for budget-conscious buyers seeking practicality and efficiency, while the Mercedes GLA caters to those desiring a blend of luxury, performance, and advanced technology.

As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, both vehicles show innovation and adaptability, reflecting the needs of today’s drivers. Whether you lean towards the sporty charm of the Puma or the sophisticated allure of the GLA, both models promise an exciting and fulfilling driving experience.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Mercedes B Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
The Mercedes B‑Class is the practical, airy people‑carrier that prioritises space and comfort, while the Mercedes GLA takes the same mechanical smarts and adds SUV looks, higher ride height and a touch more road presence. Pick the B‑Class for family‑friendly sense and efficiency, choose the GLA if …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes GLA costs 38,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,922 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLA uses 2.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 343 km more than the Mercedes GLA.

GLA

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLA offers significantly more power – delivering 421 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLA is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLA delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 254 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLA carries very slightly more – 500 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLA is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,800
GLA

Mercedes GLA

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 421 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 km
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes GLA

The Mercedes GLA blends Mercedes style with compact crossover practicality, looking sharper than its size suggests while still feeling purposeful around town. Inside it serves up premium materials and tech-forward ergonomics, and the composed ride makes it an appealing pick for buyers who want luxury wrapped in a city-friendly package with a wink of adventurous spirit.

details
20C0047_067
20C0047_071
20C0047_104
20C0047_115

Reviews Mercedes GLA

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Lucien
1 May 2026, 07:12:24

GLA 180 petrol. Ideal for city and highway. Very smooth and quiet. The automatic gearbox is a delight. Average consumption 6.2 L/100 km. Special edition 180 Cyber Edition, leather seats....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gutter
24 Feb 2026, 21:53:27

Super nimble, very impressive power from this 1,300cc mild‑hybrid engine — in town, on the road and on the motorway for this 2025 GLA 180 Style AMG... premium interior!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Serge
16 Jan 2026, 16:09:11

You have to compare like with like — the GLA should be compared to the Q3, not the Q2 as in your study!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes A Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
The Mercedes A‑Class is the sharper, more driver-focused hatch that feels nimble and refined on twisty roads, while the Mercedes GLA trades a bit of agility for SUV practicality with a higher ride height, extra luggage space and a commanding view of the road. Pick the A‑Class for sporty handling, …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize excitement behind the wheel. On the other hand, the VW Polo offers a more traditional hatchback experience, characterized by its solid …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
Ford Puma
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
38,800 - 75,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
74 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
66 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,570 - 1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
385 - 435 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,834 - 1,849 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
480 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 421 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
230 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 310 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,991 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.