Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault R4 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault R4?
Ford Puma vs Renault R4: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault R4 costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,411 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is a bit more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Renault R4. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 8 km more than the Renault R4.
R4
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault R4 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault R4 offers significantly more boot space – 1,045 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 522 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 443 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault R4
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Renault R4
The Renault R4, affectionately known as the "R4," is a quintessential symbol of French automotive simplicity and practicality. This classic compact car, originally introduced in the early 1960s, won over numerous enthusiasts with its versatile design and dependable performance. Its no-frills charm and robust build made it a beloved choice for rural drivers and city dwellers alike, cementing its status as an iconic piece of automotive history.
details
Ford Puma
Renault R4
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
27,300 - 32,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
409 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,537 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
420 - 1,045 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,808 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
385 - 443 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.