Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Symbioz - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 24400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Symbioz?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Symbioz has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 343 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Symbioz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Symbioz
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slight edge – offering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Symbioz tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slight lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1359 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers barely noticeable more room – 576 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz performs evident better – up to 1682 L, which is about 399 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Renault Symbioz
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Renault Symbioz
5 (1 Reviews)
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Symbioz
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
24400 - 30700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1359 - 1465 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4413 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1682 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.