Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 16,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SEAT Ibiza?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When you pit two popular models like the Ford Puma and SEAT Ibiza against each other, the outcome is often a matter of personal preference and driving habits. In this article, we delve into the core features, technical specifications, and innovations that define these two vehicles, enabling prospective buyers to make an informed decision.
The Ford Puma offers a choice between petrol MHEV and all-electric powertrains, boasting power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP. Among these, the MHEV variant presents a middle ground of performance and efficiency, sporting a 1.0-liter, 3-cylinder engine with a fuel consumption of as low as 5.4 L/100km. The electric option extends a compelling electric range of up to 376 km, appealing to the eco-conscious.
On the other hand, the SEAT Ibiza leans towards the conventional petrol engine, available in 95 to 150 HP configurations. The Ibiza’s 1.0-liter 3-cylinder and 1.5-liter 4-cylinder engines offer a respectable fuel economy, consuming around 5.1 to 5.7 L/100km. This efficiency, combined with a curb weight as low as 1111 kg, shapes the Ibiza as a nimble hatchback.
Both the Ford Puma and SEAT Ibiza come with manual and automatic transmission options. The Puma gives drivers a choice between a manual gearbox, a dual-clutch automatic, and a reduction gearbox in its electric variant, ensuring versatility across its model spectrum.
The SEAT Ibiza, however, keeps things simpler with its well-engineered manual and dual-clutch automatic options, offering smooth and predictable gear changes. This results in a spirited driving experience characteristic of smaller hatchbacks.
A closer inspection of their dimensions reveals distinct design philosophies. The Ford Puma, at 4226 mm in length, presents itself as a compact SUV, accentuated by its generous trunk capacity of 523 L and elevated ride height of 1555 mm. These features cater to those seeking practicality and ample cargo space.
In contrast, the SEAT Ibiza embraces a more streamlined hatchback profile with a length of 4059 mm and a width of 1780 mm. Its 355 L trunk space reflects its urban adaptability, an advantageous trait for city dwellers focusing on compact maneuverability and parking ease.
Safety and technology are areas where both models shine. The Ford Puma integrates advanced driver-assist systems and connectivity features, which are becoming increasingly standard in the SUV segment. These enhance user convenience and ensure top-tier safety standards across all trims.
Meanwhile, the SEAT Ibiza includes technology upgrades like improved infotainment systems and enhanced safety assists, promoting a secure and entertaining driving experience. As compact as it is efficient, Ibiza doesn't fall behind in offering modern innovations that satisfy tech-savvy customers.
Ultimately, your choice between the Ford Puma and SEAT Ibiza should reflect your lifestyle needs. For those inclined towards a spacious and versatile SUV with eco-conscious credentials, the Ford Puma offers a compelling package. Conversely, the SEAT Ibiza provides an engaging driving experience with practical benefits inherent in a hatchback.
In conclusion, both the Ford Puma and SEAT Ibiza stand out in their respective niches, packed with features and well-engineered powertrains. Your decision will largely hinge on whether you prioritize the SUV's versatility or the hatchback's compact efficiency and nimble performance.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SEAT Ibiza is clearly cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,072 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Ibiza uses 5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers moderately more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the SEAT Ibiza takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ibiza is a bit lighter – 1,111 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 355 L. That’s a difference of about 168 L.
When it comes to payload, the SEAT Ibiza carries moderately more – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The SEAT Ibiza is a cheeky, well-priced hatchback that blends sharp styling with a grown-up driving character, making it a smart choice for city commuters who still want a bit of fun. Inside it's practical and neatly finished, with sensible kit and easygoing manners that make everyday life less fussy — a car that doesn't try too hard but gets the job done with a smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
16,800 - 28,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
114 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,111 - 1,231 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
355 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,780 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
489 - 522 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 15.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
95 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España