Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Elroq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Elroq?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4286 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Skoda Elroq with 15.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 573 km, about 197 km more than the Ford Puma.
Elroq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a decisively edge – offering 340 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Skoda Elroq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls convincingly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is decisively lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 637 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs somewhat better – up to 1580 L, which is about 297 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq to a small extent takes the win – 531 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Elroq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Skoda Elroq
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Skoda Elroq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
29100 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
470 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.