Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Ford Puma vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Skoda Octavia Combi costs 25,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,663 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Combi uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers moderately more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Combi delivers a bit more torque with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,366 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Combi carries moderately more – 534 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £25,600
Skoda Octavia Combi
Ford Puma
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.