VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Octavia Combi – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Skoda Octavia Combi.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Octavia Combi has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Octavia Combi manages with 4.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Octavia Combi @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Octavia Combi pulls distinct stronger with 370 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1366 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers somewhat more room – 640 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1700 L, which is about 417 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Octavia Combi to a small extent takes the win – 534 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Octavia Combi shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £24,400
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407

Skoda Octavia Combi

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.9 L

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Wagon impresses with its spacious interior, offering ample room for both passengers and luggage. It maintains a sleek and modern design, making it a stylish choice for families and professionals alike. The vehicle boasts an efficient engine range, providing a smooth and responsive driving experience.

details
Ford Puma
Skoda Octavia Combi
Puma
Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
24400 - 42300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1366 - 1534 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
640 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1829 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
471 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.