VS

Ford Puma vs Subaru Outback comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 169 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 40,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Subaru Outback?

Ford Puma vs Subaru Outback: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

Subaru Outback

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Subaru Outback costs 40,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,106 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Subaru Outback with 8.6 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.

Outback

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Subaru Outback offers very slightly more power – delivering 169 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Subaru Outback takes 10.2 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 252 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,643 kg. The difference is around 327 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Subaru Outback offers barely more boot space – 561 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.

When it comes to payload, the Subaru Outback carries slightly more – 557 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Subaru Outback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Subaru Outback

The Subaru Outback is the do-it-all wagon for buyers who want SUV capability without the SUV bulk, blending rugged confidence with everyday civility. It's practical, dependable, and built to shrug off rough gravel tracks or rainy commutes with a grin — ideal for buyers who actually use their vehicles, not just park them for show.

details
Ford Puma
Subaru Outback

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
40,000 - 44,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
193 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,643 - 1,676 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
561 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,875 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
524 - 557 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
169 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
252 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
124 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
2,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Subaru
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.