VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Urban Cruiser comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Urban Cruiser?

Ford Puma vs Toyota Urban Cruiser: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • visibly lighter
details

Toyota Urban Cruiser

4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • marginally more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota Urban Cruiser costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,506 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Toyota Urban Cruiser. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Urban Cruiser offers marginally more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 9 km more than the Ford Puma.

Urban Cruiser

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Urban Cruiser offers marginally more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Urban Cruiser delivers only slightly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,839 kg. The difference is around 523 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries slightly more – 469 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Toyota Urban Cruiser

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Toyota Urban Cruiser

The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a compact SUV that offers a blend of style and practicality, making it well-suited for urban living. It captures attention with its bold design, while providing a high driving position that enhances visibility and control on city roads. Inside, the Urban Cruiser offers comfortable seating and a range of features that cater to both driver and passengers, emphasizing convenience and everyday usability.

details
Ford Puma
Toyota Urban Cruiser

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
33,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
395 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,839 - 1,939 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
306 - 310 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
411 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
174 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 8.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
128 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.