Compare performance (168 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Omoda 5?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs have become a staple for modern consumers seeking a blend of performance, efficiency, and style. Today, we delve into a showdown between two intriguing contenders: the Ford Puma and the Omoda 5. With their unique offerings, both models promise a competitive drive. Let's explore their technical aspects and innovations.
The Ford Puma presents a versatile range of engine options. Buyers can choose between the EcoBoost petrol mild-hybrid setup and a fully electric powertrain. The petrol variants offer between 125 to 168 HP, powered by a three-cylinder engine with a modest engine capacity of 999 cm³. Meanwhile, the electric variant delivers a peak output of 160 HP and a remarkable electric range of up to 376 km, thanks to its 43 kWh battery capacity.
On the other side of the ring, the Omoda 5 boasts a robust 204 HP from its 1.6-liter four-cylinder petrol engine. With a torque of 290 Nm, it promises exhilarating acceleration, clocking 0-100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds. This makes the Omoda 5 slightly faster off the line compared to some of the Puma's configurations.
Both vehicles employ front-wheel drive systems, enhancing their maneuverability and handling in urban settings. The Ford Puma offers flexibility with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing a personalized driving experience. The Omoda 5, while limited to a dual-clutch automatic transmission, ensures smooth and efficient gear transitions, well-suited for everyday city commutes and highway cruising.
Efficiency is a critical factor for environmentally-conscious consumers. The Ford Puma's hybrid technology allows consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100km for the petrol versions, while the electric variant consumes approximately 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The Puma's CO2 emissions range from 121 to 136 g/km, with the electric model offering zero tailpipe emissions.
In comparison, the Omoda 5 registers a fuel consumption of 7.5 L/100km. While its higher engine capacity naturally results in greater consumption, its performance-oriented design focuses more on spirited driving and less on outright efficiency.
The Ford Puma offers compact dimensions with a length of up to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm. Its significant trunk capacity ranges from 456 to 523 liters, ensuring ample space for cargo and flexibility for family trips. With five seats and a comfortable interior layout, the Puma is designed for practical urban living.
Despite being slightly larger with a length of 4424 mm and a width of 1830 mm, the Omoda 5 does not divulge official trunk capacities. Yet, its spacious cabin and modern amenities cater to passengers seeking comfort and advanced in-car technology.
The Ford Puma and Omoda 5 each bring their strengths to the table. The Puma stands out with its versatile powertrain options, sleek efficiency, and practical design, appealing to eco-conscious drivers and those seeking adaptability in their drive. Meanwhile, the Omoda 5 offers robust power and rapid acceleration, perfect for enthusiasts who value performance without the compromise on everyday usability.
The choice comes down to personal priorities: performance vs. versatility and innovation. Both the Puma and Omoda 5 are vehicles that deserve a place in today's competitive SUV marketplace.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 uses 5.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Omoda 5 offers barely more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 13 km more than the Ford Puma.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers markedly more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers somewhat more torque with 340 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 305 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers markedly more boot space – 523 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries somewhat more – 536 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.
The Omoda 5 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 120 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
431 - 536 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Omoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España