Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Omoda 5?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs have become a staple for modern consumers seeking a blend of performance, efficiency, and style. Today, we delve into a showdown between two intriguing contenders: the Ford Puma and the Omoda 5. With their unique offerings, both models promise a competitive drive. Let's explore their technical aspects and innovations.
The Ford Puma presents a versatile range of engine options. Buyers can choose between the EcoBoost petrol mild-hybrid setup and a fully electric powertrain. The petrol variants offer between 125 to 168 HP, powered by a three-cylinder engine with a modest engine capacity of 999 cm³. Meanwhile, the electric variant delivers a peak output of 160 HP and a remarkable electric range of up to 376 km, thanks to its 43 kWh battery capacity.
On the other side of the ring, the Omoda 5 boasts a robust 204 HP from its 1.6-liter four-cylinder petrol engine. With a torque of 290 Nm, it promises exhilarating acceleration, clocking 0-100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds. This makes the Omoda 5 slightly faster off the line compared to some of the Puma's configurations.
Both vehicles employ front-wheel drive systems, enhancing their maneuverability and handling in urban settings. The Ford Puma offers flexibility with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing a personalized driving experience. The Omoda 5, while limited to a dual-clutch automatic transmission, ensures smooth and efficient gear transitions, well-suited for everyday city commutes and highway cruising.
Efficiency is a critical factor for environmentally-conscious consumers. The Ford Puma's hybrid technology allows consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100km for the petrol versions, while the electric variant consumes approximately 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The Puma's CO2 emissions range from 121 to 136 g/km, with the electric model offering zero tailpipe emissions.
In comparison, the Omoda 5 registers a fuel consumption of 7.5 L/100km. While its higher engine capacity naturally results in greater consumption, its performance-oriented design focuses more on spirited driving and less on outright efficiency.
The Ford Puma offers compact dimensions with a length of up to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm. Its significant trunk capacity ranges from 456 to 523 liters, ensuring ample space for cargo and flexibility for family trips. With five seats and a comfortable interior layout, the Puma is designed for practical urban living.
Despite being slightly larger with a length of 4424 mm and a width of 1830 mm, the Omoda 5 does not divulge official trunk capacities. Yet, its spacious cabin and modern amenities cater to passengers seeking comfort and advanced in-car technology.
The Ford Puma and Omoda 5 each bring their strengths to the table. The Puma stands out with its versatile powertrain options, sleek efficiency, and practical design, appealing to eco-conscious drivers and those seeking adaptability in their drive. Meanwhile, the Omoda 5 offers robust power and rapid acceleration, perfect for enthusiasts who value performance without the compromise on everyday usability.
The choice comes down to personal priorities: performance vs. versatility and innovation. Both the Puma and Omoda 5 are vehicles that deserve a place in today's competitive SUV marketplace.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Omoda 5 is barely cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 772 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers slightly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The Omoda 5 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
23,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,424 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,588 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,075 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
220 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Omoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España