Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo XC40?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11991 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
XC40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a a bit edge – offering 197 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 372 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1328 L, which is about 45 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 to a small extent takes the win – 532 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Volvo XC40
5 (4 Reviews)
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.