Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo XC40 – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Volvo XC40 fits your lifestyle better.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 11991 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
XC40
@ Volvo Cars
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a a bit edge – offering 197 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 372 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1328 L, which is about 45 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 to a small extent takes the win – 532 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Volvo XC40 proves to be won narrowly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,800
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Volvo XC40
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
Ford Puma
Volvo XC40
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.