@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Ford Puma vs VW Golf Variant – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or VW Golf Variant?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs. VW Golf Variant: A Battle of Versatility and Innovation

As the automotive world continues to evolve, crossover SUVs and wagons remain popular among consumers seeking practicality without compromising on style and innovation. This article pits two formidable contenders against each other — the Ford Puma and the VW Golf Variant. Each vehicle brings a distinct flavor to the mix, promising a blend of performance, comfort, and cutting-edge technology. Here’s how they stack up.

Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Power and Performance

The Ford Puma, available in both petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) and electric variants, showcases a range of engine options that cater to diverse driving preferences. With power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP, the Puma guarantees a captivating driving experience. The 6-speed manual gearbox and 7-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission options further enhance its agility, while the front-wheel-drive layout ensures efficient power distribution. Notably, the Ford Puma Electric delivers a noteworthy electric range of up to 376 km, marking it as a formidable choice for environmentally conscious drivers.

On the other hand, the VW Golf Variant comes equipped with a wide array of engine choices, including petrol MHEV, petrol, and diesel options. The Golf Variant's power spectrum extends from 116 to an impressive 333 HP, appealing to a wide audience. The dual-clutch automatic transmission and manual gearbox options ensure a smooth transition between gears, complemented by front-wheel and all-wheel-drive configurations that provide versatility across varied road conditions.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Efficiency remains a core aspect for both models. The Ford Puma's consumption figures range between 5.4 and 6 L/100km for petrol engines, while electric variant consumption sits between 13.1 and 13.7 kWh/100km. With CO2 emissions ranging from an eco-friendly 0 g/km in electric mode to 136 g/km for petrol variants, the Puma addresses both performance and environmental concerns.

Meanwhile, the VW Golf Variant's petrol engine consumption ranges from 5.2 to 8.5 L/100km, showcasing its focus on fuel economy. Its CO2 emissions vary from 115 to 194 g/km, with the lower end highlighting its efficiency credentials and advanced technology in emissions control.

Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Design and Interior Space

The Ford Puma embodies a sleek, SUV-inspired design with a compact body that's perfect for urban adventures. With dimensions welcoming a height of approximately 1550 mm and a width of 1805 mm, the Puma is both agile and versatile. A trunk capacity of up to 523 liters ensures ample space for cargo, suitable for both daily commutes and weekend getaways.

The VW Golf Variant, known for its wagon body style, offers a more extended silhouette. Its length of 4631 mm and width of 1789 mm provide a spacious interior environment. The Golf Variant excels with a generous trunk capacity of 611 liters, catering effortlessly to the needs of families and travel enthusiasts.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Innovations and Features

Both vehicles are rich in technological innovations. The Ford Puma integrates an array of advanced features including a high-efficiency powertrain, user-friendly infotainment systems, and various driver assistance programs designed to enhance safety and convenience.

VW’s flagship wagon doesn't fall short either, with a suite of high-end technology. The Golf Variant features cutting-edge infotainment and connectivity options, as well as advanced safety systems, ensuring a comprehensive and enjoyable driving experience.

Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion

The Ford Puma and VW Golf Variant stand as strong contenders in their respective segments, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Puma appeals to those seeking a spirited and environmentally mindful drive in a compact SUV form, while the Golf Variant is optimal for those valuing expansive space and the dependability synonymous with VW. Ultimately, the choice between these two revered vehicles rests on your individual priorities and lifestyle.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the VW Golf Variant costs 26100 £. That’s a price difference of around 1367 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Golf Variant manages with 4.30 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Golf Variant has a clearly edge – offering 333 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 165 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Golf Variant is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Golf Variant performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Golf Variant pulls noticeable stronger with 420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1366 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW Golf Variant offers slightly more room – 611 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 88 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Golf Variant performs distinct better – up to 1642 L, which is about 359 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, VW Golf Variant a bit takes the win – 547 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Golf Variant shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £26,100
Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Golf Variant

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 333 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 8.2 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

VW Golf Variant

The Golf Estate packs Volkswagen's familiar poise into a practical, grown-up estate that quietly makes everyday life easier without shouting for attention. It's clever, comfortable and roomy enough for weekend kit or family chaos, offering smart packaging and refined manners that make it a sensible and surprisingly stylish choice for buyers who need space but don't want a van.

details
DB2021AU00446_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00624_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00625_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00816_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00818_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00641_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU00910_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Octavia Combi
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
Ford Puma
VW Golf Variant
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Golf Variant @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
26100 - 48700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
114 - 185 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1366 - 1621 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
611 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4631 - 4651 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1789 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1462 - 1487 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1624 - 1642 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
489 - 547 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 333 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
202 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
220 - 420 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 245 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G, F, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.