VS

Ford Ranger vs Hyundai Bayon comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 90 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 20,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Hyundai Bayon?

Ford Ranger vs Hyundai Bayon: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai Bayon is clearly cheaper – starting at 20,500 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,954 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

Bayon

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 525 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is considerably lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,230 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 529 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i20
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Bayon and the Hyundai i20 comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and extra practicality (Bayon) or a sharper, more efficient hatchback with sportier handling (i20). I’ll compare their space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Ford Ranger
Hyundai Bayon

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.

details
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-02
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-08
hyundai-all-new-bayon-interior-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-details-06

Reviews Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Jorge Soares
13 Aug 2026, 23:52:06

Apesar dos motores japoneses serem muito eficientes e mais económicos que os motores europeus, especialmente no gasto de combustível considero que o Hyundai Bayon tem um equipamento de série de segurança e de entretenimento dos mais completos, penso que a bagageira do Bayon é maior que a do Honda Jazz. A aparência do Hyundai Bayon é mais moderna/actual... A traseira do Bayon devia ser mais bem trabalhada porque acho a frente do carro mais bonita que a traseira...
Conto adquirir a breve prazo um Bayon...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Janusz
29 Apr 2026, 09:15:55

Definitely the Hyundai Bayon — the most important thing is the simply designed 1.2 MPI four-cylinder engine, 84 hp, adapted for LPG and cheap to repair, beautiful looks, a five-year warranty, cheaper to buy, and performance completely sufficient for a senior. A four-cylinder engine runs smoother and is better refined. I will buy this car in December 2026 at the Hyundai dealership in Toruń.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
André CGARLIER
20 Jan 2026, 19:35:46

I bought the HUNDAY BAYON one month ago.
600 km later, first small problem — the gauge stopped working.
I have an appointment set for 15 days from now. That said, it’s a real pleasure to drive: very smooth, lively acceleration, comfortable and perfect visibility. 800 km on the clock, but I’ve noticed city fuel consumption is much higher than advertised — 9.7 litres/100 km, mostly urban driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i30
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai i30 serve different buyers: the Bayon is a compact crossover offering a taller driving position and SUV-style practicality, while the i30 is a conventional family hatchback focused on sharper handling and on-road refinement. This comparison will help you decide whether …
Hyundai Bayon
VW T-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Hyundai Bayon or the VW T-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Bayon
Opel Mokka
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and the Opel Mokka are compact, city-focused crossovers aimed at buyers who want easy manoeuvrability, practical cabins and SUV styling in a small footprint. Deciding between the Bayon and the Mokka usually comes down to prioritising value and roomy practicality (Bayon) versus …
Hyundai Bayon
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Skoda Kamiq are compact B‑segment crossovers that target buyers wanting small-SUV style with car-like driving manners. The Bayon leans on sharp pricing, bold styling and generous equipment, while the Kamiq is stronger on interior space, ride refinement and everyday …
Hyundai Bayon
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Hyundai Bayon stands out with its bold styling and spacious interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of practicality and modern design. Meanwhile, the Toyota Yaris Cross is praised for its hybrid efficiency and advanced safety features, making …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Ford Ranger
Hyundai Bayon

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
20,500 - 26,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
130 - 132 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,200 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
411 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,775 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
450 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
90 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
172 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
66 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Hyundai
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.