Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Colt?
Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Colt is significantly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,277 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Colt
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers considerably more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 138 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 537 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is considerably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,216 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 604 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Ranger stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
Mitsubishi Colt
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Mitsubishi Colt
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Ford Ranger
Mitsubishi Colt
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.