VS

Ford Ranger vs Rolls-Royce Phantom – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Ranger has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 372900 £. That’s a price difference of around 335332 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Phantom with 15 L. The difference is about 11.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom has a decisively edge – offering 571 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 279 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Rolls-Royce Phantom performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Rolls-Royce Phantom pulls evident stronger with 900 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 203 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Ranger is evident lighter – 2082 kg compared to 2560 kg. The difference is around 478 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger convincingly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 668 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Ranger proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Ranger is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £37,500
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 292 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 13.8 L
  • Electric Range : 42 km
details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C @ media.ford.com
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8 @ media.ford.com

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details

Similar Comparisons

Ford Ranger
Mercedes GLC
VS
Ford Ranger
Toyota Highlander
VS
Ford Ranger
Rolls-Royce Phantom
Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
37500 - 71900 £
Price
372900 - 447400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Consumption L/100km
15 - 15.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
341 - 344 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
100 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
2 - 4
Doors
4
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
Curb weight
2560 - 2610 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
0 - 548 L
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
Length
5762 - 5982 mm
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
Width
2018 mm
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
Height
1646 - 1656 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
250 km/h
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
Engine capacity
6749 cm3

General
Model Year
2022 - 2025
Model Year
2020
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce

Similar Comparisons

Ford Ranger
Toyota Hilux
VS
In the ongoing battle of the midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux both deliver rugged performance and reliability, making them favorites among adventure enthusiasts. The Ranger stands out with its dynamic driving experience and modern technology, while the Hilux is renowned for its toughness and off-road capability. Ultimately, the choice between these two stalwarts depends on personal preference, whether one prioritizes a spirited ride or unparalleled durability.
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Discovery
VS
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
Fiat Ducato
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Kuga
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Transit Custom Camper
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Ranger
Hyundai i10
VS
Ford Ranger
Hyundai Tucson
VS
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.