Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Skoda Kodiaq?
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,562 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 80 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers barely more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 297 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is substantially lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 721 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 426 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Ford Ranger
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Ford Ranger
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.