VS

Ford Ranger vs Suzuki Vitara comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Suzuki Vitara?

Ford Ranger vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Vitara is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,868 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers substantially more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 384 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Vitara

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers markedly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers considerably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 390 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is considerably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,150 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 564 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 344 - 426 km
Ford Ranger
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Suzuki Vitara

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details
Ford Ranger
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
395 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.