Compare performance (281 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Volvo EC40?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo EC40 is barely cheaper – starting at 46,500 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,905 £.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 543 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 161 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers very slightly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 340 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 554 kg.
The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|