Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (292 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Volvo S60?
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo S60 is barely cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,069 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo S60 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 94 km, about 52 km more than the Ford Ranger.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Ranger is only slightly faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers only slightly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is significantly lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 690 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 514 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Ford Ranger
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Ford Ranger
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.