Compare performance (281 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 43,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or VW ID. Buzz Cargo?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW ID. Buzz Cargo is moderately cheaper – starting at 43,600 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,875 £.
As for electric range, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers substantially more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 413 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers marginally more torque with 697 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, VW ID. Buzz Cargo is barely lighter – 2,264 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 753 kg. That’s a difference of about 236 kg.
The VW ID. Buzz Cargo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsThe VW ID. Buzz Cargo marries retro Volkswagen charm with a thoroughly modern electric work van, offering a surprisingly spacious and practical load area wrapped in friendly, iconic styling. It's a smart pick for urban tradespeople and small businesses who want quiet, effortless driving, lower running costs and easy maneuverability — with a healthy dash of nostalgia on the job.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
43,600 - 51,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.2 - 20.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
330 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
2,264 - 2,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,712 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,985 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,932 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,900 L
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
640 - 753 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
145 - 160 km/h
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|