Compare performance (286 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Skoda Kodiaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,797 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers barely more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|