Compare performance (269 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 20,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Kia Stonic?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Kia Stonic is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,918 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 154 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
126 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,760 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|