VS

GWM WEY 03 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM WEY 03 or Skoda Kodiaq?

GWM WEY 03 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

GWM WEY 03

  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • significantly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

WEY 03

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the GWM WEY 03 costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,180 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the GWM WEY 03 uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the GWM WEY 03 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 139 km, about 17 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 03 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 03 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM WEY 03 delivers considerably more torque with 685 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 491 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 517 L. That’s a difference of about 393 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries markedly more – 563 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 188 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM WEY 03 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
WEY 03

GWM WEY 03

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 367 - 442 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 130 - 139 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
GWM WEY 03
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM WEY 03

The WEY 03 cuts a striking figure with sharp, futuristic styling and an interior that punches above its weight for premium feel and tech. For buyers after distinctive looks, a comfy cabin and confident handling without the same badge drama, it’s a compelling alternative that also adds a dash of personality to everyday driving.

details
serpimg_a26B5d

Reviews GWM WEY 03

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq each offer unique strengths that cater to different drivers. The Kuga impresses with its agile handling and tech-savvy interior, making it a great choice for urban dwellers who value both style and functionality. Meanwhile, the …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling options for families seeking versatility and comfort. The Hyundai Santa Fe impresses with its bold styling, advanced safety features, and an array of technology options, making it a strong contender for …
GWM WEY 03
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 47,900 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
130 - 139 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
15 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,295 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
517 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
375 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 442 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
500 - 685 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
270 - 325 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
GWM
Brand
Skoda
Is the GWM WEY 03 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.