VS

Honda e:Ny1 vs Mazda CX-30 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Honda e:Ny1 or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

e:Ny1 @ hondanews.eu

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Honda e:Ny1 costs 33400 £. That’s a price difference of around 8186 £.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda e:Ny1 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 204 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda e:Ny1 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs noticeable better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Honda e:Ny1 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Honda e:Ny1 pulls noticeable stronger with 310 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

e:Ny1 @ hondanews.eu

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is somewhat lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1730 kg. The difference is around 275 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more room – 430 L compared to 361 L. That’s a difference of about 69 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – up to 1406 L, which is about 230 L more than the Honda e:Ny1.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 distinct takes the win – 496 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 146 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Honda e:Ny1

The Honda e:Ny1 embodies the brand's vision for a sustainable and stylish urban driving experience. With its distinctive design and advanced technology, it offers a glimpse into the future of electric mobility. Inside, the cabin showcases a minimalist yet functional aesthetic, providing comfort and connectivity for modern drivers.

details
436177_e_Ny1_The_next_all-electric_vehicle_from_Honda_combines_comfort_performance @ hondanews.eu
436180_e_Ny1_The_next_all-electric_vehicle_from_Honda_combines_comfort_performance @ hondanews.eu
436166_e_Ny1_The_next_all-electric_vehicle_from_Honda_combines_comfort_performance @ hondanews.eu
436173_e_Ny1_The_next_all-electric_vehicle_from_Honda_combines_comfort_performance @ hondanews.eu

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Honda e:Ny1
Mazda CX-30
e:Ny1
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
33400 - 36000 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
18.20 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
412 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1730 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
344 - 361 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4387 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1790 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1584 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1136 - 1176 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
350 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.60 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
310 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Honda e:Ny1
Nissan Leaf
VS
What drive types are available for the Honda e:Ny1?

The Honda e:Ny1 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.