Compare performance (218 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 21900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Jeep Avenger?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Avenger has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1115 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.90 kWh.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona performs noticeable better – achieving up to 514 km, about 114 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 218 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls slight stronger with 265 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is a bit lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers slightly more room – 466 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1300 L, which is about 23 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger hardly perceptible takes the win – 502 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
The Hyundai Kona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
detailsThe Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1776 mm
|
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.