@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
VS

Hyundai Kona vs Jeep Avenger – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Jeep Avenger?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Avenger has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £, while the Hyundai Kona costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 1115 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.90 kWh.

As for range, the Hyundai Kona performs noticeable better – achieving up to 514 km, about 114 km more than the Jeep Avenger.

Avenger @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 218 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls slight stronger with 265 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is a bit lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers slightly more room – 466 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1300 L, which is about 23 L more than the Jeep Avenger.

When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger hardly perceptible takes the win – 502 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Hyundai Kona proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Hyundai Kona is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £23,100
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km

Hyundai Kona

5 (1)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details

Jeep Avenger

5 (2)
rate

The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.

details
Hyundai Kona
Jeep Avenger
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company
Avenger @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
23100 - 41600 £
Price
21900 - 36900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1776 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
494 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2023 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Jeep
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.