Compare performance (156 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Mazda CX-30?
The compact SUV market has never been more competitive, with automotive enthusiasts constantly on the lookout for vehicles that offer the perfect balance of performance, innovation, and style. One of the most exciting showdowns in this segment is between the Jeep Avenger and the Mazda CX-30. Each brings a unique set of features, appealing to different kinds of drivers.
When it comes to engine choices, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its versatility. It offers both electric and petrol options, including a Petrol MHEV. The electric variant boasts 156 HP, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in just 9 seconds, making it a solid performer for an eco-friendly SUV with a range of 400 km.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 relies on petrol MHEV engines, hitting up to 186 HP. It can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, which showcases Mazda's commitment to delivering driving pleasure. However, it doesn't offer an electric option, which might be a deal-breaker for those seeking zero-emission rides.
The Avenger provides a variety of transmission choices, ranging from a reduction gearbox to manual and dual-clutch automatic options. With front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, it provides adaptable performance for different driving conditions.
Similarly, the CX-30 is available with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, along with front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. Mazda's precision tuning and engineering are evident in the drive feel, promising an engaging experience behind the wheel.
In terms of size, the Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length, making it slightly more compact than the CX-30, which is 4395 mm long. The compact dimension of the Avenger provides ease of maneuverability in urban settings. However, the CX-30 offers a larger trunk capacity of 430 liters, compared to the Avenger's 355 liters, making it the better choice for those who prioritize cargo space.
Both SUVs are known for their impressive fuel efficiency. The Avenger's petrol variant consumes between 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, while the CX-30 ranges from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. As an electric model, the Avenger uses just 15.4 kWh/100km, representing a true testament to Jeep's commitment to reducing environmental impact.
When considering CO2 efficiency, the Avenger offers a more environmentally friendly range with classes from A to D. Meanwhile, the CX-30's classification ranges between D and E, reflecting a higher environmental footprint due to its larger engine capacity and power output.
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Mazda CX-30 largely depends on your priorities as a driver. If you seek a groundbreaking electric option with a nimble size, the Jeep Avenger beckons. However, if performance and drivability are priorities, Mazda's heritage in creating some of the most driver-centric vehicles shines through in the CX-30.
Both SUVs demonstrate why compact SUVs are highly in demand, offering practical features, innovation, and performance that make the daily drive a pleasure in their own rights. Whichever you choose, rest assured that both the Avenger and CX-30 are bound to keep you excited on the road.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Jeep Avenger is slightly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,692 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers barely more torque with 260 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is visibly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 275 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers moderately more boot space – 430 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries barely more – 502 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
The Jeep Avenger has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España