VS

Jeep Avenger vs MG MG3 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or MG MG3?

Jeep Avenger vs MG MG3: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter
details

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Avenger

A Tale of Two: Jeep Avenger vs MG3

In today's automotive landscape, choosing the right car can be a daunting task. This is particularly true when comparing two dynamic yet distinctly different vehicles: the Jeep Avenger and the MG3. Though differing in body type and technological focus, both models present compelling options for today's discerning driver. Let's delve deeper into the technical aspects and innovations each car brings to the table.

MG3

Design and Dimensions

The Jeep Avenger is a prime example of a modern SUV. At 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and a height range from 1528 to 1536 mm, the Avenger presents a robust and assertive profile. With its 5-door configuration and a trunk capacity that ranges from 325 to 380 liters, it offers versatility for both daily commutes and adventurous journeys.

On the other hand, the MG3 is designed as a hatchback, with a length of 4113 mm, a width of 1797 mm, and a height of 1502 mm. Despite its slightly larger dimensions, it maintains a compact feel. The MG3 offers a fuel-efficient option with a trunk capacity of 293 liters, making it a practical choice for urban environments.

Avenger

Power and Performance

Under the hood, the Jeep Avenger offers diverse powertrain options. From an electric engine producing 156 HP with an electric range of 400 km, to petrol and mild hybrid variants delivering up to 136 HP, it caters to a wide range of preferences. The torque varies from 205 to 260 Nm, promising a responsive driving experience. Acceleration is impressive, with the electric model achieving 0 to 100 km/h in just 9 seconds, and a maximum speed reaching up to 194 km/h.

The MG3, while lacking an electric option, stands out with its full hybrid and petrol engines. The hybrid produces 194 HP and provides a rapid acceleration at 8 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, with a top speed of 170 km/h. Petrol versions deliver a balanced performance with 116 HP and a torque of 85 kW, ensuring an engaging drive.

MG3

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Efficiency is a key consideration, and here the Avenger's electric option is the standout, boasting a consumption of 15.4 kWh/100km with zero CO2 emissions. Petrol versions maintain competitiveness, with a fuel consumption ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km.

MG3's hybrid leads in efficiency with a consumption rate of 4.4 L/100km, while petrol versions average 6.1 L/100km. With CO2 emissions of 100 g/km for hybrids, it aligns closely with environmental goals, though petrol models see emissions rise to 137 g/km.

Avenger

Technological Innovations

The Avenger integrates cutting-edge technology, particularly evident in its electric model with a battery capacity of 51 kWh. The availability of automatic and manual transmissions across different models ensures adaptability to driver preferences.

MG3, while not offering an electric model, makes up with its advanced hybrid technology and user-friendly features in both automatic and manual transmissions. Its intuitive design ensures it remains a favorite among tech-savvy urbanites.

MG3

Conclusion

Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and MG3 ultimately depends on personal priorities. The Avenger offers versatility, power, and innovative electric solutions for eco-conscious drivers. The MG3, however, provides impressive hybrid tech and efficiency, ideal for those seeking practicality in urban settings. Both represent modern achievements in automotive design and function, catering to varied lifestyles and preferences in the ever-evolving world of cars.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MG3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Jeep Avenger costs 22,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,122 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

MG3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers slightly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers significantly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 112 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is barely lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,237 kg. The difference is around 57 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries moderately more – 502 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 400 km
details
Jeep Avenger
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
Opel Corsa
VS
Choosing between the MG3 and the Opel Corsa means weighing a budget-friendly, quirky small hatch against a more refined, mainstream rival with stronger dealer support. Which suits you will come down to priorities like build quality, driving refinement, fuel economy and after-sales service.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Citroen C3
MG MG3
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the MG3 puts two budget-friendly city hatchbacks head-to-head: the C3 leans toward comfort, distinctive styling and a refined ride, while the MG3 focuses on low cost, generous interior space and straightforward practicality. If you value a plush, design-led small car go …
Hyundai i20
MG MG3
VS
The Hyundai i20 and the MG3 are compact hatchbacks aimed at budget-conscious buyers, but they take different approaches: the i20 focuses on refinement, safety and a more premium interior, while the MG3 prioritises bold styling and value-packed equipment. This comparison will help you decide which …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
The Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a dose of SUV styling. The Puma leans toward sporty handling, clever packaging and frugal petrol/mild-hybrid options, while the Avenger prioritises rugged looks and an …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Jeep Avenger
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
494 - 502 kg
Payload
373 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Jeep
Brand
MG
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.