VS

Jeep Avenger vs Polestar 3 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 67,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Polestar 3?

Jeep Avenger vs Polestar 3: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Polestar 3

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Jeep Avenger is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,086 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Jeep Avenger is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Polestar 3. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Polestar 3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 647 km, about 247 km more than the Jeep Avenger.

3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 524 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 3 delivers considerably more torque with 870 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,315 kg. The difference is around 1,135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Polestar 3 offers noticeably more boot space – 484 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Polestar 3 carries markedly more – 645 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 143 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £67,600
3

Polestar 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 601 - 647 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Jeep Avenger
Polestar 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
Feedback tends to portray the Avenger as an attractive, city-friendly small SUV with smooth, efficient powertrains and generally agile urban manners. Owners often praise its fuel economy, responsive automatic gearing and pleasant driving feel, while typical negatives frequently mention inconsistent fit-and-finish, recurring electronic/display glitches and relatively narrow seats or limited cabin space. Opinions are somewhat mixed — several owners report trouble-free mechanical use, so buyers should weigh the appealing driving characteristics against the reported quality and electronics concerns.
Kurt
2 Jul 2026, 03:11:44

Ideal size — used only as a 2-seater.
Price acceptable —
Parking and handling — senior-friendly — controls also without touchscreen — buttons and knobs

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Polestar 3

Polestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.

details
660436_20221012_Polestar_3
660426_20221012_Polestar_3
660442_20221012_Polestar_3
660445_20221012_Polestar_3
661749_20221012_Polestar_3
661750_20221012_Polestar_3

Reviews Polestar 3

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Polestar 3
Volvo EX60
VS
Two Scandinavian siblings square up for the tech‑luxury crown: the razor‑edged, driver‑focused Polestar 3 vs the elegant, safety‑obsessed Volvo EX60. We're lining them up to find which deserves your money—and your garage: the sharp, sporty statement or the cosseting, clever cruiser.
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Polestar 3
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 3 is the grown‑up grand tourer of the pair — a spacious, plush coupe‑SUV that favours comfort, range and open‑road refinement. The Polestar 4, by contrast, trades some rear‑seat space for sleeker styling, sharper handling and a friendlier price tag, making it the sportier, more city‑savvy …
Jeep Avenger
MG ZS
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the MG ZS both aim at buyers wanting a small, practical SUV but take very different approaches. The Avenger is a compact, city-friendly Jeep with an electric drivetrain and rugged styling, while the MG ZS is a budget-focused small SUV offering spacious practicality and a choice …
Fiat 600
Jeep Avenger
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Jeep Avenger comes down to whether you prefer a compact, city-focused car with Italian flair or a small crossover that offers higher ground clearance and a more rugged image. This comparison will look at space, efficiency, driving feel, safety and running costs …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Jeep Avenger
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its rugged styling and off-road capabilities, appealing to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross offers a more refined approach with its sleek design and practical interior, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Jeep Avenger
Polestar 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Price
67,600 - 91,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
601 - 647 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
2,315 - 2,525 kg
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 502 kg
Payload
605 - 645 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Polestar
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.