@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-30?

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

The Jeep Compass VS Mazda CX-30: A Battle of Compact SUVs

Today’s SUV market is brimming with choices, but two models stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-30, both from the 2024 model year, compete fiercely in the compact SUV category. This article dives into a head-to-head comparison, exploring technical specifications, innovative features, and everyday usability to help you decide which one might be the perfect fit for your lifestyle.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine Options and Performance

The Jeep Compass offers a varied powertrain lineup, featuring both Petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid options. Its power output spans from 130 to 240 horsepower, depending on the variant, with torque figures peaking at 240 Nm. Models equipped with All-Wheel Drive (AWD) add versatility, suitable for off-road adventures and challenging weather conditions. Jeep's commitment to providing strong performance is further highlighted by the impressive dual-clutch and automatic transmissions available within its lineup.

The Mazda CX-30 also introduces Petrol MHEV engines but opts for a simpler approach with power outputs of either 140 or 186 horsepower. Torque figures are similarly robust at up to 240 Nm. Although it lacks a hybrid option, the CX-30 promises a natural driving experience with manual gearbox options alongside the traditional automatic transmission. Mazda’s dedication to driving pleasure is evident in their manual transmission choice, offering purists a more engaging driving experience.

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

On the efficiency front, the Jeep Compass offers standout consumption figures, especially with its Plugin Hybrid variant, boasting an impressive 2 L/100 km. Furthermore, it offers an electric range of 36 km, making it a suitable option for those looking to economize on fuel and minimize emissions. For relevant CO2 emissions, the Compass holds a strong position with a low figure of 48 g/km in its plugin hybrid form.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30, while not hybrid, offers commendable fuel consumption ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. This results in CO2 emissions from 129 to 148 g/km, which align with typical non-hybrid petrol standards, placing it in CO2 efficiency classes D and E. It's a choice that serves those prioritizing straightforward petrol reliability without the added complexity of hybrid systems.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Practicality

When it comes to size and practicality, the Compass measures slightly larger, offering a length of 4404 mm compared to the CX-30's 4395 mm. This translates into a rear passenger space and cargo capacity of 438 to 420 liters in the Compass, while the CX-30 provides a trunk capacity between 430 to 422 liters, reflecting a well-thought-out use of space within a compact footprint.

In terms of interior tech and comfort, both SUVs seat five comfortably, albeit with different philosophies. The Compass lends itself to a sense of rugged adventure with its off-road capabilities. In contrast, the CX-30 emphasizes Mazda’s hallmark of sleek design and driver-focused interiors, offering a more urban-oriented atmosphere.

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Driving Dynamics and Innovations

The Jeep Compass accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in times ranging between 10.3 to 7.3 seconds, showcasing versatility from practical to sprightly performance levels across the range. Its maximum speed spans from 183 to 200 km/h, highlighting a balance between everyday usability and highway performance.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a similar 0 to 100 km/h acceleration performance between 8.3 to 10.3 seconds. This is paired with maximum speeds reaching up to 204 km/h, displaying Mazda’s focus on providing an agile road experience rooted in their Zoom-Zoom philosophy.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which SUV Is Right for You?

In selecting between the Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-30, consider your driving preferences and lifestyle needs. If you favor hybrid efficiency, occasional off-road adventures, and diverse driving conditions, the Jeep Compass might be your best bet. However, if you lean towards a more traditional driving experience with a focus on sleek design and direct handling, the Mazda CX-30 stands out as a strong contender.

Ultimately, both SUVs represent excellent choices within the compact segment, each bringing its brand's strengths and innovations to the table. Whether trailblazing with Jeep or savoring the refined road feel of Mazda, these models serve as exemplary choices for the modern driver.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Jeep Compass costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 8966 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass has a somewhat edge – offering 213 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slight better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Compass pulls evident stronger with 345 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm difference.

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is to a small extent lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1667 kg. The difference is around 212 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers evident more room – 550 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass performs barely noticeable better – up to 1561 L, which is about 155 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be only a minor advantage and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Jeep Compass

2 (1)
rate

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-30
Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 43200 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
500 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 133 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4552 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1928 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1675 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Avenger
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
VS
When comparing the Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass, the Avenger stands out with its more compact design, making it ideal for city driving while still offering solid off-road capabilities. In contrast, the Compass delivers a more spacious interior and a smoother ride, appealing to families and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?

The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.