VS

Jeep Compass vs VW T-Roc – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Jeep Compass or VW T-Roc fits your lifestyle better.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Jeep Compass vs. VW T-Roc: The Battle of the Compact SUVs

In the dynamic world of compact SUVs, the 2024 Jeep Compass and the VW T-Roc are prime contenders jostling for attention. Both vehicles bring a flair of innovative engineering, practical enhancements, and an appealing aesthetic. But how do they stand up against one another on the technical front? Let's delve into a detailed comparison.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Powertrain and Performance

The 2024 Jeep Compass seeks to woo drivers with a choice of Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and Plugin Hybrid engines. This flexibility in engine type is paired with either dual-clutch automatic or traditional automatic transmissions, catering to both front-wheel and all-wheel drive enthusiasts. The power output is robust, ranging from 130 HP to 240 HP, and offers an acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 10.3 and an impressive 7.3 seconds.

The T-Roc, on the other hand, provides an extensive selection of petrol and diesel engines, going up to 300 HP. It also provides a choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, available in either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. Acceleration for the T-Roc varies between 10.8 to an agile 4.9 seconds for its high-end model.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Efficiency and Range

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Compass plugin hybrid shines with a consumption rate as low as 2 L/100km and an electric range of 36 km. Conversely, the T-Roc offers a range of consumptions, starting from 4.7 L/100km with its efficient diesel engine.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Capacity and Practicality

Both the Compass and T-Roc seat up to five passengers, providing ample space and comfort for occupants. The Compass offers a trunk capacity of up to 438 liters, while the T-Roc provides a slightly larger trunk space with a capacity of 445 liters, ensuring practicality for family trips or weekend getaways.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Dimensions and Exterior Design

The exterior dimensions highlight the Compass's slightly more elongated body at 4404 mm in length compared to T-Roc's compact 4271 mm. Both vehicles maintain a width of 1819 mm, though the T-Roc offers a variety in height from 1527 mm to 1584 mm, contrasting with the taller Compass standing at 1629 mm to 1649 mm. These factors contribute to their distinctive visual profiles on the road.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Environmental Impact

With environmental concerns ever-growing, CO2 efficiency plays a crucial role. The Compass plugin hybrid impressively achieves a CO2 output as low as 48 g/km, whereas the T-Roc, with its diverse engine line-up, exhibits CO2 emissions starting from 125 g/km.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Final Thoughts

The choice between the Jeep Compass and the VW T-Roc ultimately hinges on individual priorities. The Compass takes a step towards eco-friendly driving with its hybrid options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. Meanwhile, the T-Roc appeals with a wider range of powertrains, offering both thrill and practicality. Each SUV has its own distinct charm and capability, reflecting the diverse demands of the modern driver.

In the battle of the compact SUVs, both the Jeep Compass and VW T-Roc offer compelling packages, ensuring each finds its rightful place in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Roc has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Jeep Compass costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7762 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jeep Compass manages with 2 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 3.50 L per 100 km.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass has a noticeable edge – offering 240 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Compass pulls evident stronger with 345 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is minimal lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1575 kg. The difference is around 110 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers somewhat more room – 550 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass performs slight better – up to 1387 L, which is about 37 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Jeep Compass proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jeep Compass is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £34,200
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28

Jeep Compass

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.50 kWh
  • Electric Range : 36 - 500 km
details

Jeep Compass

2 (1)
rate

The Jeep Compass combines a rugged aesthetic with modern sophistication, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV segment. Its robust design is complemented by a comfortable interior that offers ample space and cutting-edge technology for a seamless driving experience. Whether tackling urban environments or venturing off-road, the Compass provides versatility and reliability, embodying the adventurous spirit synonymous with the Jeep brand.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002 @ media.stellantis.com
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012 @ media.stellantis.com

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc seamlessly blends stylish design with practical functionality, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy both urban and countryside driving. Its modern interior features intuitive technology and comfortable seating, enhancing the overall driving experience. With its robust build and dynamic performance, the T-Roc is equipped to handle various road conditions with confidence.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a roomier boot, so choose the Golf for sharper handling and economy or the T‑Roc if you want presence, flexibility and the delightful illusion of being an inch taller.
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Jeep Compass
VW T-Roc
Compass
T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 46900 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
36 - 500 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 133 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1575 - 2198 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
420 - 550 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4404 - 4552 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1819 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1629 - 1675 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1230 - 1387 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
465 - 470 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1469 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Jeep
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Vauxhall Frontera
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Opel Frontera stands as a solid, robust option with a storied history of off-road capability, making it appealing to adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a more modern aesthetic with a focus on stylish urban driving, advanced safety features, and tech-savvy interior appointments. When choosing between the two, potential buyers will weigh the Frontera's rugged legacy against the T-Roc's contemporary flair and agility.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology features. Both vehicles provide ample space and versatility, making them ideal choices for urban lifestyles, but each has its unique flair to cater to different tastes.
Hyundai Tucson
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and VW T-Roc both offer compelling choices for drivers seeking versatility and style. The Tucson stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it ideal for families and tech enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the T-Roc shines with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize agile performance and a more compact footprint.
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?

The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.