Compare performance (225 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the dynamic world of compact SUVs, the 2024 Jeep Compass and the VW T-Roc are prime contenders jostling for attention. Both vehicles bring a flair of innovative engineering, practical enhancements, and an appealing aesthetic. But how do they stand up against one another on the technical front? Let's delve into a detailed comparison.
The 2024 Jeep Compass seeks to woo drivers with a choice of Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and Plugin Hybrid engines. This flexibility in engine type is paired with either dual-clutch automatic or traditional automatic transmissions, catering to both front-wheel and all-wheel drive enthusiasts. The power output is robust, ranging from 130 HP to 240 HP, and offers an acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 10.3 and an impressive 7.3 seconds.
The T-Roc, on the other hand, provides an extensive selection of petrol and diesel engines, going up to 300 HP. It also provides a choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, available in either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. Acceleration for the T-Roc varies between 10.8 to an agile 4.9 seconds for its high-end model.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Compass plugin hybrid shines with a consumption rate as low as 2 L/100km and an electric range of 36 km. Conversely, the T-Roc offers a range of consumptions, starting from 4.7 L/100km with its efficient diesel engine.
Both the Compass and T-Roc seat up to five passengers, providing ample space and comfort for occupants. The Compass offers a trunk capacity of up to 438 liters, while the T-Roc provides a slightly larger trunk space with a capacity of 445 liters, ensuring practicality for family trips or weekend getaways.
The exterior dimensions highlight the Compass's slightly more elongated body at 4404 mm in length compared to T-Roc's compact 4271 mm. Both vehicles maintain a width of 1819 mm, though the T-Roc offers a variety in height from 1527 mm to 1584 mm, contrasting with the taller Compass standing at 1629 mm to 1649 mm. These factors contribute to their distinctive visual profiles on the road.
With environmental concerns ever-growing, CO2 efficiency plays a crucial role. The Compass plugin hybrid impressively achieves a CO2 output as low as 48 g/km, whereas the T-Roc, with its diverse engine line-up, exhibits CO2 emissions starting from 125 g/km.
The choice between the Jeep Compass and the VW T-Roc ultimately hinges on individual priorities. The Compass takes a step towards eco-friendly driving with its hybrid options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. Meanwhile, the T-Roc appeals with a wider range of powertrains, offering both thrill and practicality. Each SUV has its own distinct charm and capability, reflecting the diverse demands of the modern driver.
In the battle of the compact SUVs, both the Jeep Compass and VW T-Roc offer compelling packages, ensuring each finds its rightful place in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW T-Roc is noticeably cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,762 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers visibly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers clearly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is moderately lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 202 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers considerably more boot space – 550 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 266 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.
The Jeep Compass is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España