VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (380 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (85,600 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Grand Cherokee or Suzuki S-Cross?

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Jeep Grand Cherokee

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Grand Cherokee

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 63,866 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses 2.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers considerably more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 270 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Grand Cherokee delivers substantially more torque with 637 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 402 Nm more.

Grand Cherokee

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is significantly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 1,154 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers slightly more boot space – 520 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Grand Cherokee carries clearly more – 641 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 236 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Grand Cherokee is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£85,628
Grand Cherokee

Jeep Grand Cherokee

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 380 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 45 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Grand Cherokee

The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

details
foto18-620d0d79532b9_620dfd913fa92
FOTO 1
FOTO 9
FOTO 48

Reviews Jeep Grand Cherokee

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Peter
24 Aug 2026, 23:05:21

Value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Hyundai Tucson
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Hyundai Tucson and the Suzuki S‑Cross: both are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality and low running costs, but they take different approaches — the Tucson leans toward space, comfort and technology, while the S‑Cross focuses on affordability, simplicity and efficiency. …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and Dacia Bigster compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
85,600 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
45 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,434 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
520 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,968 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
641 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
380 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
637 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
280 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Jeep Grand Cherokee offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Grand Cherokee is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.