Compare performance (202 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Musso or Ford Ranger?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
KGM Musso is considerably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,019 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the KGM Musso with 8.5 L/100km. The difference is about 5.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers visibly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers visibly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 256 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso is moderately lighter – 2,070 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso carries marginally more – 1,085 kg compared to 989 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.
The Ford Ranger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Musso is a rugged, no-nonsense pickup that balances practical utility with a comfortable cabin, making it equally at home on a jobsite or a weekend drive. It’s a sensible choice for drivers who want straightforward capability, durability and a reassuringly solid feel without unnecessary complexity.
details
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 44,100 £
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.5 - 9.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
223 - 246 g/km
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,185 kg
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
860 - 1,085 kg
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
400 - 441 Nm
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
KGM
|
Brand
Ford
|