VS

Kia Ceed vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (140 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,500 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Ceed or Mazda CX-30?

Kia Ceed vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Kia Ceed

  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately lighter

Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Ceed

The Hatchback vs. The SUV: A Closer Look at the Kia Ceed and Mazda CX-30

In the world of compact cars, the Kia Ceed and the Mazda CX-30 present two distinct yet compelling options for buyers in 2024. With both vehicles offering innovative technology and performance-oriented specs, there is much to compare and contrast. While the Kia Ceed takes on the persona of a reliable hatchback, the Mazda CX-30 enters with the heightened stance and practicality of an SUV.

CX-30

Engine Power and Performance

The Kia Ceed, available with both Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and traditional petrol engines, offers a versatile driving experience. With power outputs ranging from 100 to 140 HP and a torque spectrum of 172 to 253 Nm, it's designed for efficient city driving. The Ceed accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a span ranging from 9.5 to 13.2 seconds depending on the variant, and reaches top speeds between 178 and 197 km/h.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30, exclusively using MHEV technology, offers a more powerful performance with its options of 140 and 186 HP. Its torque rests steadily around 238 to 240 Nm. The CX-30 accelerates to 100 km/h from a standstill in as little as 8.3 seconds, proving a bit sportier than its hatchback competitor. The max speed measures up to 204 km/h, providing a satisfying edge for enthusiasts.

Ceed

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to efficiency, the Kia Ceed consumes between 6.0 to 6.4 L/100km, placing it in CO2 Efficiency Class E with emissions between 137 to 146 g/km. Its curb weight varies from 1298 to 1390 kg and comes with a fuel tank capacity of 50 liters, ensuring reasonable range and practicality.

In comparison, the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more efficient, with fuel consumption varying from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. It falls mainly within CO2 Efficiency Classes D and E, emitting 129 to 148 g/km, thanks to its advanced MHEV system. The CX-30’s weight ranges from 1455 to 1587 kg, and it can hold between 48 and 51 liters of fuel.

CX-30

Space and Practicality

Space is always a priority for buyers seeking comfort and utility. The Kia Ceed offers a trunk capacity of 357 to 395 liters, with overall dimensions measuring 4315 to 4325 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a low roofline at 1442 to 1447 mm, reflecting its sleek appearance. The hatchback design further accentuates its accessibility.

In terms of practicality, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a superior trunk capacity at 422 to 430 liters, a testament to its SUV body style. With an exterior measuring 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and standing taller at 1540 mm, it affords a commanding presence on the road along with enhanced passenger comfort.

Ceed

Conclusion: Choose Your Adventure

The choice between the Kia Ceed and the Mazda CX-30 revolves around preferences for body style, performance needs, and lifestyle. While the Ceed might appeal to those seeking a nimble, city-friendly machine, the CX-30 suits individuals desiring a spirited drive with SUV practicality. Both models affirm their brand’s commitment to quality, innovation, and driving pleasure for the modern era.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ceed

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Ceed is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,757 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Kia Ceed with 6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Kia Ceed takes 9.5 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Ceed delivers only slightly more torque with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.

Ceed

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Ceed is moderately lighter – 1,298 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries only slightly more – 496 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Kia Ceed
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Ceed

The Kia Ceed is a sensible, stylish hatchback that gives buyers more than they'd expect for the money, blending practical space with crisp, modern looks. It drives with measured confidence and comes loaded with user-friendly kit, so you can enjoy daily life behind the wheel without breaking into a sweat.

details
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_01
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_02
Kia_XCeed_MJ2023_Innen

Reviews Kia Ceed

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i30
Kia Ceed
VS
Two Korean siblings with the same DNA but different attitudes, the Hyundai i30 and Kia Ceed square off to see which compact hatchback is the smarter buy. We’ll park them side-by-side, compare driving feel, equipment and running costs, and tell you which one actually deserves your driveway — and …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Ford Focus
Kia Ceed
VS
When it comes to compact hatchbacks, the Ford Focus and Kia Ceed both offer compelling options for drivers seeking a blend of practicality and performance. The Ford Focus stands out with its agile handling and sporty driving dynamics, making it a joy on winding roads. Meanwhile, the Kia Ceed …
Kia Ceed
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
VS
The Kia Ceed and the Kia Ceed Sportswagon offer a remarkable blend of style, efficiency, and practicality for modern drivers. While both models share the same dynamic performance and sleek design cues, the Ceed Sportswagon stands out with its expanded cargo capacity, providing extra versatility for …
Kia Ceed
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive compact segment, the Kia Ceed and Kia Stonic each offer unique advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Ceed impresses with its spacious interior and refined ride quality, making it a strong choice for families or those who prioritize comfort on longer journeys. In …
Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …
Kia Ceed
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,500 - 26,300 £
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
6 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
137 - 146 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,298 - 1,372 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
478 - 490 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 140 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 13.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 - 253 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 103 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,482 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Kia Ceed?

The Kia Ceed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.