VS

Lamborghini Urus vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (800 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (199,400 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lamborghini Urus or Mazda CX-30?

Lamborghini Urus vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Lamborghini Urus

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Urus

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Lamborghini Urus costs 199,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 173,743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lamborghini Urus uses 2.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lamborghini Urus offers significantly more power – delivering 800 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 614 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lamborghini Urus delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 710 Nm more.

Urus

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is considerably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lamborghini Urus offers markedly more boot space – 616 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries clearly more – 496 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 146 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lamborghini Urus is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £199,400
Urus

Lamborghini Urus

  • Engine Type Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 666 - 800 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.1 - 14.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Lamborghini Urus
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lamborghini Urus

The Lamborghini Urus wears its raging bull badge with SUV practicality, serving supercar drama in a package you can live with every day. It hustles through corners like a sports car while hauling weekend gear with unapologetic style, perfect for buyers who crave attention and usable performance.

details
522121
522148
522142
522141
493413
524220

Reviews Lamborghini Urus

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Gautier
24 Jun 2026, 18:13:34

I think it's really beautiful and great, even though I love the Ferrari Purosangue… but it's very expensive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Renault Rafale
Lamborghini Urus
VS
In a surprising showdown, the Renault Rafale takes on the luxury powerhouse Lamborghini Urus, showcasing how diverse the automotive landscape can be. While the Urus boasts an unmistakable blend of opulence and raw performance, the Rafale impresses with its practicality and innovative tech features, …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
In a competitive showdown between the Mazda CX-30 and the VW Golf, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and characteristics. The CX-30 impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and practicality, while the Golf offers a well-rounded …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Audi Q2 and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Lamborghini Urus
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
199,400 - 257,100 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.1 - 14.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
51 - 320 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
85 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,150 - 2,405 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
454 - 616 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
5,112 - 5,137 mm
Length
-
Width
2,018 - 2,026 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
1,618 - 1,638 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,596 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
100 - 350 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
666 - 800 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 - 3.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
305 - 312 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
850 - 950 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
490 - 588 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Lamborghini
Brand
Mazda
Is the Lamborghini Urus offered with different drivetrains?

The Lamborghini Urus is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.