VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24,500 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or VW T-Roc?

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • very slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is very slightly cheaper – starting at 24,500 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,890 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Roc uses 5.5 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers barely more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

3 Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is very slightly lighter – 1,419 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers somewhat more boot space – 351 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries barely more – 515 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,500
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres

Reviews Mazda 3 Hatchback

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
VW T-Roc
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that balance everyday practicality with distinct personalities—one leaning sporty and style‑focused, the other aiming for broad appeal and comfort. This quick comparison highlights how the Formentor’s sharper driving character and design …
Opel Mokka
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Vauxhall Mokka and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise urban agility and distinctive style or a more refined, spacious and versatile compact SUV. The Mokka stands out for bold design and nippy city manners, while the VW T‑Roc offers sharper handling, more interior …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 485 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.