VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q2 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 300 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 24,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Audi Q2?

Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q2: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more trunk space

Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q2 is marginally cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Q2

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers clearly more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely more boot space – 430 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries very slightly more – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q2 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,900
Q2

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Audi Q2

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q2

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details
A207341_overfull
A207339_overfull
A207364_overfull
A207355_overfull
A207349_overfull
A207346_overfull

Reviews Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
miles
14 Feb 2026, 20:00:47

ive really enjoyed my 2 audi q2s and still looking for a match .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Audi Q2
BMW 1 Series
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Audi Q2 and BMW 1er Reihe each offer distinct advantages that cater to different preferences. The Q2 impresses with its striking design, advanced technology, and a more spacious interior, making it a strong contender for those seeking a stylish …
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …
Audi Q2
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its youthful design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. Meanwhile, the Mercedes GLA offers a more luxurious experience with its refined interior and advanced technology features, …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, …
Mazda CX-30
Audi Q2

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
127 - 183 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
450 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Audi
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.