VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Lamborghini Urus – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Lamborghini Urus?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Lamborghini Urus costs 199400 £. That’s a price difference of around 174214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lamborghini Urus manages with 2.10 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 3.60 L per 100 km.

Urus @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lamborghini Urus has a significantly edge – offering 800 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 614 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.30 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 5 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Lamborghini Urus performs evident better – reaching 312 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 108 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lamborghini Urus pulls significantly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 710 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is convincingly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2150 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lamborghini Urus offers clearly perceptible more room – 616 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lamborghini Urus performs slightly better – up to 1596 L, which is about 190 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 evident takes the win – 496 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 146 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Lamborghini Urus proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lamborghini Urus is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £199,400
522121

Lamborghini Urus

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 666 - 800 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.1 - 14.1 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Lamborghini Urus

The Lamborghini Urus is a striking blend of performance, luxury, and versatility, embodying the spirit of a supercar in a high-performance SUV form. Its bold design and aggressive lines make a statement on the road, ensuring it stands out in any environment. Inside, the Urus combines premium materials with cutting-edge technology, offering a driving experience that is both exhilarating and comfortable.

details
522121 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
522148 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
522142 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
522141 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
493413 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
524220 @ Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Lamborghini Urus
CX-30
Urus

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
199400 - 257100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.1 - 14.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
51 - 320 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
85 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
2150 - 2405 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
454 - 616 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
5112 - 5137 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
2018 - 2026 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1618 - 1638 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1596 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
100 - 350 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
666 - 800 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 - 3.5 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
305 - 312 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
850 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
490 - 588 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
3996 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2022 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Lamborghini

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the Captur offers versatility with its ample cargo space and user-friendly technology. Ultimately, your choice between these two vehicles will depend on whether you prioritize performance or everyday functionality.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.