VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 2008 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Peugeot 2008?

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 2008: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
details

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-30

Introduction: A Tale of Two Compact SUVs

The automotive market is continuously evolving, with manufacturers vying to create the perfect compact SUV. In this comparison, we delve into the characteristics and technical specifications of two standout contenders: the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008. Each car boasts unique features, strengths, and innovations that cater to diverse consumer preferences. Let’s explore both models in detail.

2008

Design and Dimensions

Both the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 present striking aesthetics that resonate well with modern consumers. The CX-30 features a length of 4,395 mm, a width of 1,795 mm, and a height of 1,540 mm, giving it a robust and confident stance. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 is slightly smaller, measuring 4,304 mm in length, 1,770 mm in width, and 1,523 mm in height. Despite the dimensional differences, both SUVs provide ample cabin space for five occupants, along with sufficient cargo capacity—430 liters for the CX-30 and 434 liters for the 2008.

CX-30

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-30 offers a range of petrol mild hybrid engines with outputs of 140 to 186 HP and torque from 238 to 240 Nm. The vehicle can be equipped with either front or all-wheel drive, offering flexibility depending on driving needs. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from 8.3 seconds to 10.3 seconds, ensuring a sprightly performance for urban driving and highway excursions.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 provides a diverse mix of petrol and electric options. Engine outputs range from 101 HP to a powerful 156 HP, with torque reaching up to 270 Nm. The 0-100 km/h acceleration spans from 8.3 to 10.9 seconds, comparable to its competitor. Notably, the Peugeot offers an electric variant with a range of up to 406 km, showcasing its commitment to electrification, making it a practical choice for eco-conscious buyers.

2008

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel consumption is always a critical consideration for SUV buyers. The Mazda CX-30's figures range from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it well within its category. The Peugeot 2008, however, edges it out slightly with efficiencies as low as 5.0 L/100km for petrol models, alongside its electric counterpart consuming 15.5 to 15.9 kWh/100km. The Peugeot’s CO2 emissions range from a commendable 0 g/km for the electric version to 129 g/km, which places it highly in terms of eco-friendliness.

CX-30

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles feature well-designed interiors, promising comfort and style. The Mazda CX-30’s cabin is adorned with high-quality materials and an intuitive MZD Connect system, offering seamless smartphone integration. With a user-friendly infotainment interface and ample safety features including advanced driver assistance systems, it represents Mazda’s commitment to driver-centric design.

The Peugeot 2008 shines with its modern i-Cockpit, which includes a compact steering wheel and a central touchscreen that integrates well with the driver’s line of sight. The Peugeot’s tech offerings also include advanced connectivity options and driver aids that enhance safety and convenience on the road.

2008

Ride and Handling

The driving experience is a crucial factor in choosing an SUV. The Mazda CX-30 is praised for its agile handling and responsive steering, providing a sportier feel compared to its competitors. The all-wheel drive option further enhances stability and control, especially in adverse weather conditions.

Conversely, the Peugeot 2008 delivers a comfortable ride with a more relaxed driving demeanor, focusing on passenger comfort and smooth navigation through urban landscapes. Although sportiness may not be its forte, it compensates with superior ride quality, making it an excellent option for city dwellers.

CX-30

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

The Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 both present compelling cases in the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 offers robust performance and a driver-focused experience, while the 2008 stands out with its electrified options and innovative interior design. Each SUV caters to different consumer needs, whether it be spirited driving or eco-friendly commuting. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual preferences, driving habits, and lifestyle requirements.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Peugeot 2008 is marginally cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 943 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 2008 uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

2008

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.3 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 2008 delivers a bit more torque with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is slightly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 192 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers barely more boot space – 434 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries only slightly more – 496 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 2008 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
2008

Peugeot 2008

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 405 km
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
434 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,770 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
407 - 447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.