@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 2008 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Peugeot 2008?

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Introduction: A Tale of Two Compact SUVs

The automotive market is continuously evolving, with manufacturers vying to create the perfect compact SUV. In this comparison, we delve into the characteristics and technical specifications of two standout contenders: the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008. Each car boasts unique features, strengths, and innovations that cater to diverse consumer preferences. Let’s explore both models in detail.

2008 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Design and Dimensions

Both the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 present striking aesthetics that resonate well with modern consumers. The CX-30 features a length of 4,395 mm, a width of 1,795 mm, and a height of 1,540 mm, giving it a robust and confident stance. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 is slightly smaller, measuring 4,304 mm in length, 1,770 mm in width, and 1,523 mm in height. Despite the dimensional differences, both SUVs provide ample cabin space for five occupants, along with sufficient cargo capacity—430 liters for the CX-30 and 434 liters for the 2008.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-30 offers a range of petrol mild hybrid engines with outputs of 140 to 186 HP and torque from 238 to 240 Nm. The vehicle can be equipped with either front or all-wheel drive, offering flexibility depending on driving needs. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from 8.3 seconds to 10.3 seconds, ensuring a sprightly performance for urban driving and highway excursions.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 provides a diverse mix of petrol and electric options. Engine outputs range from 101 HP to a powerful 156 HP, with torque reaching up to 270 Nm. The 0-100 km/h acceleration spans from 8.3 to 10.9 seconds, comparable to its competitor. Notably, the Peugeot offers an electric variant with a range of up to 406 km, showcasing its commitment to electrification, making it a practical choice for eco-conscious buyers.

2008 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel consumption is always a critical consideration for SUV buyers. The Mazda CX-30's figures range from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it well within its category. The Peugeot 2008, however, edges it out slightly with efficiencies as low as 5.0 L/100km for petrol models, alongside its electric counterpart consuming 15.5 to 15.9 kWh/100km. The Peugeot’s CO2 emissions range from a commendable 0 g/km for the electric version to 129 g/km, which places it highly in terms of eco-friendliness.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles feature well-designed interiors, promising comfort and style. The Mazda CX-30’s cabin is adorned with high-quality materials and an intuitive MZD Connect system, offering seamless smartphone integration. With a user-friendly infotainment interface and ample safety features including advanced driver assistance systems, it represents Mazda’s commitment to driver-centric design.

The Peugeot 2008 shines with its modern i-Cockpit, which includes a compact steering wheel and a central touchscreen that integrates well with the driver’s line of sight. The Peugeot’s tech offerings also include advanced connectivity options and driver aids that enhance safety and convenience on the road.

2008 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Ride and Handling

The driving experience is a crucial factor in choosing an SUV. The Mazda CX-30 is praised for its agile handling and responsive steering, providing a sportier feel compared to its competitors. The all-wheel drive option further enhances stability and control, especially in adverse weather conditions.

Conversely, the Peugeot 2008 delivers a comfortable ride with a more relaxed driving demeanor, focusing on passenger comfort and smooth navigation through urban landscapes. Although sportiness may not be its forte, it compensates with superior ride quality, making it an excellent option for city dwellers.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

The Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 both present compelling cases in the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 offers robust performance and a driver-focused experience, while the 2008 stands out with its electrified options and innovative interior design. Each SUV caters to different consumer needs, whether it be spirited driving or eco-friendly commuting. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual preferences, driving habits, and lifestyle requirements.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 2008 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24500 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 772 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 2008 manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a somewhat edge – offering 186 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.30 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 2008 performs minimal better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 2008 pulls slightly stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is somewhat lighter – 1263 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 192 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers barely noticeable more room – 434 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 2008 performs slight better – up to 1467 L, which is about 61 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.

details
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 2008
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2008 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
24500 - 40300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
406 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1263 - 1623 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
434 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4304 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1770 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1523 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1467 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
407 - 447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.