VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 408 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 35100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Peugeot 408?

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9883 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 408 manages with 2.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 3 L per 100 km.

408

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 has a a bit edge – offering 225 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 408 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is minimal lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1544 kg. The difference is around 89 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 408 offers a bit more room – 536 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 106 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 5.1 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.80 kWh
  • Electric Range : 79 - 455 km
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC516
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC519
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC522
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC032

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
35100 - 48000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.80 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
58.20 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 114 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1544 - 1879 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
Length
-
Length
4687 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
-
Height
1478 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1583 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
371 - 456 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 408
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the clever compact SUV with a raised stance and family-friendly practicality, while the Peugeot 408 slips into crossover-coupe territory with sleeker lines and a more road-focused ride. Choose the 3008 for sensible versatility and roomy practicality, or the 408 if you crave …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Peugeot 308 SW
Peugeot 408
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact family cars, the Peugeot 308 SW and Peugeot 408 stand out with their unique offerings. While the 308 SW impresses with its practicality and spaciousness, thanks to its estate design, the 408 delivers a more dynamic silhouette combined with a premium interior …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
In a competitive showdown between the Mazda CX-30 and the VW Golf, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and characteristics. The CX-30 impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and practicality, while the Golf offers a well-rounded …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the burgeoning landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-30 emerge as fierce contenders, each bringing distinct attributes to the table. The Honda ZR-V excels in practicality, offering a roomier interior and a straightforward approach to driving comfort, making it a family-friendly …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.