VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 408 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Peugeot 408?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Peugeot 408 costs 35100 £. That’s a price difference of around 9883 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 408 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 has a a bit edge – offering 225 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 408 performs a bit better – reaching 233 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 29 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 408 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is minimal lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1544 kg. The difference is around 89 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 408 offers a bit more room – 536 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 106 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 408 performs somewhat better – up to 1583 L, which is about 177 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Peugeot 408 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £35,100
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 - 5.1 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.10 kWh
  • Electric Range : 77 - 453 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 captivates with its sleek and dynamic design, setting it apart in the competitive crossover market. Its interior offers a perfect blend of comfort and cutting-edge technology, creating an enjoyable driving experience. The model's efficient performance and modern features make it a compelling choice for those seeking both style and functionality in their vehicles.

details
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC516 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC519 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC522 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC032 @ media.stellantis.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 408
CX-30
408

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
35100 - 44400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 5.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.10 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
77 - 453 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
58.20 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 114 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1544 - 1879 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4687 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1478 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1583 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
371 - 456 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot

Similar Comparisons

Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 showcases its premium interior and striking design, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and comfort. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara stands out with its rugged versatility and off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Ultimately, while both SUVs offer unique strengths, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style versus practicality.
Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 408
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Peugeot 3008 offers a sporty driving experience and a well-appointed interior, making it an appealing choice for those seeking versatility. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 408, with its sleek design and emphasis on comfort, positions itself as a stylish alternative for buyers who prioritize elegance and road presence. Both models showcase Peugeot's commitment to innovation, but their distinct characteristics cater to different preferences in the growing automotive market.
Peugeot 408
Peugeot 508
VS
In the realm of Peugeot's versatile lineup, the Peugeot 408 shines with its dynamic and sleek crossover silhouette, appealing to those seeking a blend of practicality and modern design. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 508 asserts itself as the quintessential choice for those prioritizing luxury and driving refinement, offering a more sophisticated cabin and advanced technology features. Both models epitomize Peugeot's signature style and engineering, yet they cater to slightly different preferences within the automotive spectrum.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.