@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs SEAT Ateca – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or SEAT Ateca?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SEAT Ateca has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25100 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 129 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: SEAT Ateca manages with 4.90 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Ateca @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – reaching 204 km/h, while the SEAT Ateca tops out at 202 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SEAT Ateca pulls distinct stronger with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, SEAT Ateca is minimal lighter – 1345 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 110 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SEAT Ateca offers a bit more room – 510 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SEAT Ateca performs to a small extent better – up to 1604 L, which is about 198 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, SEAT Ateca barely noticeable takes the win – 525 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the SEAT Ateca shows itself to be has the upper hand and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,100
Ateca @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

SEAT Ateca

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 6.4 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

SEAT Ateca

5 (1)
rate

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT-Ateca_012 @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT-Ateca_011 @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT-Ateca_006 @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT-Ateca_004 @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology …
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Ateca
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Ateca @ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
25100 - 36900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
129 - 144 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1345 - 1514 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
510 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4381 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1601 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1604 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
516 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 202 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Ateca
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
VS
Unsure whether the CUPRA Ateca or the SEAT Ateca is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.