VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW ID.3 – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or VW ID.3 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the VW ID.3 costs 28600 £. That’s a price difference of around 3334 £.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 has a clearly edge – offering 326 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 204 km/h, while the VW ID.3 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.3 pulls convincingly stronger with 545 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, the Mazda CX-30 is noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1787 kg. The difference is around 332 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more room – 430 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1406 L, which is about 139 L more than the VW ID.3.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.

Our conclusion: The VW ID.3 proves to be wins the duel decisively and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, VW ID.3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
In the dynamic landscape of compact crossovers and electric vehicles, the Ford Puma and VW ID.3 present compelling options for modern drivers. The Ford Puma, with its sporty design and fun-to-drive character, appeals to those seeking style without sacrificing practicality. On the other hand, the VW ID.3, as a fully electric hatchback, champions cutting-edge technology and sustainability, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious urban commuters.
Kia EV3
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle of electric hatchbacks, the Kia EV3 and VW ID.3 stand out with their unique offerings. The EV3 impresses with its sleek design and advanced tech features, while the ID.3 boasts a spacious interior and a strong focus on practicality. Both cars provide an exhilarating driving experience, but choosing between them will ultimately come down to personal preferences in style and functionality.

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

VW ID.3

5 (2)
rate

The VW ID.3 represents Volkswagen's entry into the world of electric vehicles, offering a modern design that combines functionality with sustainability. Inside, you'll find a spacious and tech-forward interior, providing a comfortable driving experience while maintaining a focus on environmentally friendly materials. The ID.3's performance delivers a smooth and responsive feel on the road, making it a strong contender in the growing electric car market.

details
DB2020AU01067_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2019AU01515_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2019AU01516_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01118_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01119_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01097_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01100_medium @ Volkswagen
Mazda CX-30
VW ID.3
CX-30
ID.3

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
28600 - 49300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1787 - 1993 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
385 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4264 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1809 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1267 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
437 - 473 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the VW ID.3 and Skoda Enyaq stand out as compelling options, each showcasing impressive performance and innovation. The ID.3 is celebrated for its nimble handling and cutting-edge tech features, while the Enyaq offers a more spacious interior and a strong focus on practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electric powerhouses hinges on personal preferences for style, space, and driving experience.
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EX30 and the VW ID.3, each electric vehicle showcases its own unique strengths. The EX30 impresses with its Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, while the ID.3 highlights its spacious interior and impressive range for everyday driving. Ultimately, both models cater to eco-conscious consumers, but their differing philosophies make them appealing to varied tastes in the EV market.
VW ID.3
VW ID.4
VS
In the electric vehicle arena, the VW ID.3 and ID.4 stand out as two compelling options from Volkswagen, catering to different consumer needs. While the ID.3 excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the ID.4 offers enhanced space and versatility, appealing to families and adventure seekers. Both models showcase Volkswagen's commitment to performance and sustainability, but the choice ultimately depends on lifestyle preferences and driving habits.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Hyundai Kona
VW ID.3
VS
In the electrified showdown between the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Volkswagen ID.3, both cars bring distinct advantages to the table. The Kona Electric shines with its impressive range and affordability, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious consumers seeking long-distance capabilities. On the other hand, the VW ID.3 offers a more premium feel and an innovative design, potentially appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and cutting-edge technology in their eco-friendly ride.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.