VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW Touran – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or VW Touran?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the VW Touran costs 35400 £. That’s a price difference of around 10161 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Touran manages with 5.20 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a slightly edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Touran performs barely noticeable better – reaching 209 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Touran pulls evident stronger with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is minimal lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1520 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW Touran offers clearly more room – 834 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 404 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Touran performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1980 L, which is about 574 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, VW Touran slightly takes the win – 601 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Touran shows itself to be has the upper hand and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £35,400
DB2015AU01084_retina_2400

VW Touran

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.5 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

VW Touran

The VW Touran stands out as a versatile and reliable choice for family transportation. Its spacious interior and cleverly designed seating arrangements offer exceptional comfort and practicality for both short trips and long journeys. With a focus on safety and an array of advanced features, the Touran delivers a driving experience that combines convenience with peace of mind.

details
DB2015AU01084_retina_2400 @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2015AU01088_retina_2400 @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2015AU01085_retina_2400 @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2015AU01093_retina_2400 @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2015AU01090_retina_2400 @ volkswagen-newsroom.com

Similar Comparisons

VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, offering a more car‑like ride and road presence if you value comfort and looks over outright interior flexibility.
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
VW Touran
CX-30
Touran

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
35400 - 43900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
136 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
MPV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1520 - 1631 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
834 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4527 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1829 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1668 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1980 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
590 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 209 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

VW Tiguan
VW Touran
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the VW Tiguan and VW Touran both offer distinct advantages for families seeking versatility and comfort. While the Tiguan impresses with its sleek design and sporty driving dynamics, the Touran stands out for its spacious interior and practical seating arrangements, making it ideal for larger groups. Ultimately, the choice between these two popular VW models comes down to personal preferences in style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Touran
VS
VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
When comparing the VW Touran and VW Caddy, it's clear that both models excel in practicality, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Touran offers a more family-oriented design with a spacious interior and versatile seating arrangements, making it ideal for those who prioritize passenger comfort. In contrast, the Caddy stands out as a robust commercial vehicle, boasting impressive cargo capacity and flexibility, which appeals to business users and those requiring a workhorse for everyday tasks.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.