VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW Touran comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or VW Touran?

Mazda CX-30 vs VW Touran: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

VW Touran

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the VW Touran costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,761 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Touran uses 5.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Touran

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Touran delivers markedly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,520 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Touran offers substantially more boot space – 834 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 404 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Touran carries a bit more – 601 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
If you want a car-like family MPV with a polished interior, refined ride and tidy handling, the VW Touran feels like the grown-up choice for daily driving and longer trips. But if practicality rules—max cargo, sliding doors and a no-nonsense, van-like toughness—the VW Caddy is the smarter pick for …
VW Tiguan
VW Touran
VS
Pick the Tiguan if you want SUV presence, a higher driving position and sharper styling — it’s the more grown-up, weekend-ready choice with modern tech and a bit of attitude. The Touran, by contrast, is the pragmatic family hero: lower, roomier and endlessly adaptable, with clever seating and …
Mazda CX-30
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Touran

The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.

details
DB2015AU01084_retina_2400
DB2015AU01088_retina_2400
DB2015AU01085_retina_2400
DB2015AU01093_retina_2400
DB2015AU01090_retina_2400

Reviews VW Touran

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Touran
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Skoda Octavia Combi brings sleek looks, a big boot and crisp road manners, while the VW Touran counters with seven seats, sliding practicality and that boxy charm only an MPV can wear proudly. If you crave car-like drive and great value, go Octavia; if school runs and …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Peugeot 5008
VW Touran
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 5008 and the Volkswagen Touran comes down to whether you prefer SUV-style presence and flexible seating or a conventional MPV that prioritizes practical space and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on real-world comfort, versatility, economy and driving feel to …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
36,000 - 45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
136 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
MPV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,520 - 1,631 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
834 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
590 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.